David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (3):281 - 317 (2005)
Geach’s rich paper ‘A Program for Syntax’ introduced many ideas into the arena of categorial grammar, not all of which have been given the attention they warrant in the thirty years since its first publication. Rather surprisingly, one of our findings (Section 3 below) is that the paper not only does not contain a statement of what has widely come to be known as “Geach’s Rule”, but in fact presents considerations which are inimical to the adoption of the rule in question. With regard to at least some amongst the numerous other points extracted here from Geach’s discussion, we shall not be able to reach so definitive a conclusion, and content ourselves with giving the issues an airing.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Blome-Tillmann (2009). Non-Cognitivism and the Grammar of Morality. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 109 (1pt3):279-309.
Raffaella Bernardi (2004). Analyzing the Core of Categorial Grammar. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (2):121-137.
Mark Schroeder (2008). What is the Frege-Geach Problem? Philosophy Compass 3 (4):703-720.
Charles Sayward (2002). Geach on Generalization. Dialogue 41 (02):221-.
Aravind K. Joshi & Seth Kulick (1997). Partial Proof Trees as Building Blocks for a Categorial Grammar. Linguistics and Philosophy 20 (6):637-667.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #103,022 of 1,101,724 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,739 of 1,101,724 )
How can I increase my downloads?