David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Social Epistemology 19 (2 & 3):231 – 253 (2005)
This paper complicates, extends, and modifies Pinch and Bijker's original social construction of technology, specifically their concepts of relevant social groups, closure, and stabilization, in order to gain insight into long-term processes of how we use and understand technology. First, this paper identifies four broad categories of relevant social groups in the social construction of technology based on stake holdings and compares them according to their activities, resources, and directionality. Second, the paper discusses the distinctions between closure and stabilization of technological artifacts, introducing temporary closure and structural flexibility as a means of understanding how different technologies can relate to each other. Third, using Rosch's cognitive approach to categorization, the paper suggests structural flexibility as a means of operationalizing stabilization. These reconceptualizations offer researchers a broader scale with which to understand the social construction of technology.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
George Lakoff (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Thing: What Catergories Reveal About the Mind. University of Chicago Press.
Lgnacio Ayestarán Uriz (1997). Of Bycicles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Theoria 12 (2):394-395.
Donald Beaver (2002). The Social Shaping of Technology. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 93:476-477.
Susan Douglas (1990). Technology and Society. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 81:80-83.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael Khoo (2005). Technologies Aren't What They Used to Be: Problematising Closure and Relevant Social Groups. Social Epistemology 19 (2 & 3):283 – 285.
Erika Summers-Effler (2007). Vortexes of Involvement: Social Systems as Turbulent Flow. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (4):433-448.
Lucas D. Introna (2007). Maintaining the Reversibility of Foldings: Making the Ethics (Politics) of Information Technology Visible. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 9 (1):11-25.
Shinichi Doi & Keiji Yamada (2011). Symbiotic Technology for Creating Social Innovation 30 Years in the Future. AI and Society 26 (3):197-204.
Jeremy Hunsinger (2005). Broadening Possibilities by Expanding the Theoretical Richness of the Social Construction of Technology. Social Epistemology 19 (2 & 3):255 – 259.
David J. Stump (2000). Socially Constructed Technology. Inquiry 43 (2):217 – 224.
Philip Brey (2008). The Technological Construction of Social Power. Social Epistemology 22 (1):71 – 95.
Wade Rowland (2005). Recognizing the Role of the Modern Business Corporation in the "Social Construction" of Technology. Social Epistemology 19 (2 & 3):287 – 313.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #163,931 of 1,790,308 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #429,822 of 1,790,308 )
How can I increase my downloads?