Understanding in the Not-So-Special Sciences
Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (S1):99-114 (1996)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFrank Cunningham (1967). More on Understanding in the Social Sciences. Inquiry 10 (1-4):321-326.
Alexander Reutlinger (2011). A Theory of Non-Universal Laws. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (2):97 - 117.
James W. van Evra (1969). II. Understanding in the Social Sciences Revisited. Inquiry 12 (1-4):347-349.
Jeffry A. Simpson (2002). From Exploration to Justification: The Importance of “Special Design” Evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (4):528-529.
Carl Gillett (2006). Special Sciences. In D. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Macmillan Reference.
Suhhyun Park (2008). Hermeneutical Circle in the Understanding of Art. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 21:45-52.
Jaegwon Kim (2012). Against Laws in the Special Sciences. Journal of Philosophical Research 37:103-122.
James Woodward (2000). Explanation and Invariance in the Special Sciences. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (2):197-254.
Rolf Gruner (1967). Understanding in the Social Sciences and History. Inquiry 10 (1-4):151 – 163.
Barry Loewer (2009). Why is There Anything Except Physics? Synthese 170 (2):217 - 233.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-09-14Total downloads5 ( #161,846 of 556,747 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,754 of 556,747 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
