David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (1):115-132 (2011)
Impossible worlds are regarded with understandable suspicion by most philosophers. Here we are concerned with a modal argument which might seem to show that acknowledging their existence, or more particularly, the existence of some hypothetical (we do not say “possible”) world in which everything was the case, would have drastic effects, forcing us to conclude that everything is indeed the case—and not just in the hypothesized world in question. The argument is inspired by a metaphysical (rather than modal-logical) argument of Paul Kabay’s which would have us accept this unpalatable conclusion, though its details bear a closer resemblance to a line of thought developed by Jc Beall, in response to which Graham Priest has made some philosophical moves which are echoed in our diagnosis of what goes wrong with the present modal argument. Logical points of some interest independent of the main issue arise along the way
|Keywords||Impossible worlds Modal logic Trivialism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
David K. Lewis (1986). On the Plurality of Worlds. Blackwell Publishers.
Graham Priest (2005). Doubt Truth to Be a Liar. Oxford University Press.
Graham Priest (2005). Towards Non-Being. Clarendon Press.
Alonzo Church (1956). Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Krister Segerberg (1971). An Essay in Classical Modal Logic. Uppsala,Filosofiska Föreningen Och Filosofiska Institutionen Vid Uppsala Universitet.
Citations of this work BETA
Matteo Plebani (2015). Could Everything Be True? Probably Not. Philosophia 43 (2):499-504.
Similar books and articles
Michael Papazian (2007). The Ontological Argument of Diogenes of Babylon. Phronesis 52 (2):188 - 209.
D. Efird & T. Stoneham (2005). Genuine Modal Realism and the Empty World. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 1 (1):21-37.
Brian Leftow (2002). Anselm's Neglected Argument. Philosophy 77 (3):331-347.
Paul Oppenheimer & Edward N. Zalta (2011). A Computationally-Discovered Simplification of the Ontological Argument. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):333 - 349.
George Bealer (1993). Universals. Journal of Philosophy 60 (1):5-32.
Graham Oppy (2007). Maydole’s Modal Perfection Argument (Again). Philo 10 (1):72-84.
Agnieszka Rostalska & Rafal Urbaniak (2009). Swinburne's Modal Argument for the Existence of a Soul. Philo 12 (1):73-87.
J. L. Schellenberg (2005). The Hiddenness Argument Revisited. Religious Studies 41 (3):287-303.
Paul Kabay (2006). When Seeing is Not Believing: A Critique of Priest's Argument From Perception. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (3):443 – 460.
Added to index2010-02-06
Total downloads44 ( #98,324 of 1,911,917 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #324,434 of 1,911,917 )
How can I increase my downloads?