Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (2):193-212 (1989)
|Abstract||Clinical medicine is the application of scientific principles, rules of thumb, and a store of practical wisdom embodied in narratives of individual cases to the care of a person who is ill. Physicians are taught to observe and report the individual case both as a means of fitting nomothetic generalizations to the given circumstances and as a way of refining those generalizations. This narrative construction of illness is a principal way of knowing in medicine. In this view, disease is not so much an entity as an identifiable chronological organization of the events of illness, and medicine, rather than a science, a rational science-using activity in the service of the ill. Keywords: medical epistemology, casuistry, clinical judgment, narrative CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Albert R. Jonsen (1991). Casuistry as Methodology in Clinical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (4).
Eugenie Gatens-Robinson (1986). Clinical Judgment and the Rationality of the Human Sciences. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 11 (2):167-178.
Richard J. Baron (1981). Bridging Clinical Distance: An Empathic Rediscovery of the Known. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (1):5-24.
Kevin Wm Wildes (1994). Respondeo: Method and Content in Casuistry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (1):115-119.
Ronald Munson (1981). Why Medicine Cannot Be a Science. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (2):183-208.
Kevin Wm Wildes (1993). The Priesthood of Bioethics and the Return of Casuistry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 18 (1):33-49.
James S. Terry (1987). Medicine as Interpretation: The Uses of Literary Metaphors and Methods. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (3):205-217.
Michael Martin (1981). Is Medicine a Social Science? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 6 (4):345-360.
Kathryn Hunter (1996). “Don't Think Zebras”: Uncertainty, Interpretation, and the Place of Paradox in Clinical Education. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (3).
Kathryn Montgomery (2006). How Doctors Think: Clinical Judgment and the Practice of Medicine. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-08-19
Total downloads4 ( #188,769 of 722,741 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,247 of 722,741 )
How can I increase my downloads?