Philosophical Studies (forthcoming)
|Abstract||Frankfurt cases are purported counterexamples to the Principle of Alternative Possibilities, which implies that we are not morally responsible for unavoidable actions. A major permutation of the counterexample strategy features buffered alternatives; this permutation is designed to overcome an influential defense of the Principle of Alternative Possibilities. Here we defend the buffering strategy against two recent objections, both of which stress the timing of an agent’s decision. We argue that attributions of moral responsibility aren’t time-sensitive in the way the objectors suppose. We then turn to the crucial question of when an action is relevantly avoidable—when, in the parlance of the literature, an alternative possibility is robust. We call attention to two plausible tests for robustness that merit further consideration, showing that the agents in buffered Frankfurt cases don’t pass these tests, despite being morally responsible for their actions.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Maria Alvarez (2009). Actions, Thought-Experiments and the 'Principle of Alternate Possibilities'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):61 – 81.
John Martin Fischer (2010). The Frankfurt Cases: The Moral of the Stories. Philosophical Review 119 (3):315-336.
Robert Francis Allen (2004). Robust Alternatives and Responsibility. Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (1):21-29.
Eleonore Stump (1999). Alternative Possibilities and Moral Responsibility: The Flicker of Freedom. Journal of Ethics 3 (4):299-324.
Christopher Evan Franklin (2011). Neo-Frankfurtians and Buffer Cases: The New Challenge to the Principle of Alternative Possibilities. Philosophical Studies 152:189–207.
Michael Robinson (2012). Modified Frankfurt-Type Counterexamples and Flickers of Freedom. Philosophical Studies 157 (2):177-194.
David P. Hunt (2007). Black the Libertarian. Acta Analytica 22 (1):3-15.
Kevin Timpe (2009). Causal History Matters, but Not for Individuation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 39 (1):77-91.
Joshua Spencer (forthcoming). What Time Travelers Cannot Not Do (but Are Responsible for Anyway). Philosophical Studies.
Seth Shabo (2011). Agency Without Avoidability: Defusing a New Threat to Frankfurt's Counterexample Strategy. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (4):505-522.
David Palmer (forthcoming). Pereboom on the Frankfurt Cases. Philosophical Studies.
Gerald K. Harrison (2004). The Principle of Avoidable Blame. Ethic@ 3 (1):37-46.
Richard M. Glatz (2008). The (Near) Necessity of Alternate Possibilities for Moral Responsibility. Philosophical Studies 139 (2):257 - 272.
Justin A. Capes (2010). The W-Defense. Philosophical Studies 150:61-77.
Added to index2012-03-02
Total downloads46 ( #24,329 of 556,803 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #27,255 of 556,803 )
How can I increase my downloads?