``Frankfurt Counterexamples: Some Comments on the Widerker--Fischer Debate"

Faith and Philosophy 13 (3):395-401 (1996)
Abstract One strategy in recent discussions of theological fatalism is to draw on Harry Frankfurt’s famous counterexamples to the principle of alternate possibilities (PAP) to defend human freedom from divine foreknowledge. For those who endorse this line, “Frankfurt counterexamples” are supposed to show that PAP is false, and this conclusion is then extended to the foreknowledge case. This makes it critical to determine whether Frankfurt counterexamples perform as advertised, an issue recently debated in this journal via a pair of articles by David Widerker and John Martin Fischer. I suggest that this debate can be avoided: divine foreknowledge is itself aparadigmatic counterexample to PAP, requiring no support from suspect Frankfurt counterexamples
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 5,701
External links
  • Through your library Configure

    Similar books and articles
    David P. Hunt (1996). Frankfurt Counterexamples. Faith and Philosophy 13 (3):395-401.
    Justin A. Capes (2010). The W-Defense. Philosophical Studies 150:61-77.

    Analytics

    Monthly downloads

    Added to index

    2010-11-29

    Total downloads

    6 ( #145,673 of 549,124 )

    Recent downloads (6 months)

    2 ( #37,390 of 549,124 )

    How can I increase my downloads?


    My notes
    Sign in to use this feature


    Discussion
    Start a new thread
    Order:
    There  are no threads in this forum
    Nothing in this forum yet.

    Other forums