Further ramifications of 'grue'
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (3):257-259 (1969)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,672 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJohn Moreland (1976). On Projecting Grue. Philosophy of Science 43 (3):363-377.
Gary Sollazzo (1972). Barker and Achinstein on Goodman. Philosophical Studies 23 (1-2):91 - 97.
Mary Kate McGowan (2003). Realism, Reference and Grue (Why Metaphysical Realism Cannot Solve the Grue Paradox). American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1):47 - 57.
Edward S. Shirley (1981). An Unnoticed Flaw in Barker and Achinstein's Solution to Goodman's New Riddle of Induction. Philosophy of Science 48 (4):611-617.
J. S. Ullian (1961). More on "Grue" and Grue. Philosophical Review 70 (3):386-389.
Rosemarie Rheinwald (1993). An Epistemic Solution to Goodman's New Riddle of Induction. Synthese 95 (1):55 - 76.
C. A. Hooker (1968). Goodman, 'Grue' and Hempel. Philosophy of Science 35 (3):232-247.
Mary Hesse (1969). Ramifications of 'Grue'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 20 (1):13-25.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #274,602 of 549,037 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
