David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Critical Inquiry 33 (1):78-112 (2006)
Do you see now why it feels so good to be a critical mind? Why critique, this most ambiguous pharmakon, has become such a potent euphoric drug? You are always right! When naïve believers are clinging forcefully to their objects... you can turn all of those attachments into so many fetishes and humiliate all the believers by showing that it is nothing but their own projection, that you, yes you alone, can see. But as soon as naïve believers are thus inflated by some belief in their own importance, in their own projective capacity, you strike them by a second uppercut and humiliate them again, this time by showing that, whatever they think, their behavior is entirely determined by the action of powerful causalities coming from objective reality they don't see, but that you, yes you, the never sleeping critic, alone can see. Isn't this fabulous? Isn't it really worth going to graduate school to study critique?
|Keywords||Humanities Philosophy Multidisciplinary Theory History Fredric Jameson Jacques Derrida Edmund Husserl Terry Eagleton Noam Chomsky 780199 Other|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Louis A. Sass (2015). Lacan: The Mind of the Modernist. Continental Philosophy Review 48 (4):409-443.
Maarten Simons (2007). The ‘Renaissance of the University’ in the European Knowledge Society: An Exploration of Principled and Governmental Approaches. Studies in Philosophy and Education 26 (5):433-447.
Paul Downes (2013). Developing Derrida's Psychoanalytic Graphology: Diametric and Concentric Spatial Movements. Derrida Today 6 (2):197-221.
Similar books and articles
Lisa Bortolotti (2003). Inconsistency and Interpretation. Philosophical Explorations 6 (2):109-123.
Philip Walsh (2005). Skepticism, Modernity, and Critical Theory. Palgrave Macmillan.
Fred Leland Rush (ed.) (2004). The Cambridge Companion to Critical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Paolo Tripodi (2013). Wittgenstein on the Gulf Between Believers and Non-Believers. Philosophia 41 (1):63-79.
Eric Funkhouser (2003). Willing Belief and the Norm of Truth. Philosophical Studies 115 (2):179-95.
Robert E. Ulanowicz (2010). From Pessimism to Hope: A Natural Progression. Zygon 45 (4):939-956.
Dennis Chong (1995). Rational Choice Theory's Mysterious Rivals. Critical Review 9 (1-2):37-57.
Bob Plant (2011). Religion, Relativism, and Wittgenstein's Naturalism. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (2):177 - 209.
Kevin W. Gray (2012). Rawls and the Problem of Honour. Philosophia 40 (2):213-222.
John Abromeit (2011). Max Horkheimer and the Foundations of the Frankfurt School. Cambridge University Press.
Marshall Fine & Eli Teram (2009). Believers and Skeptics: Where Social Worker Situate Themselves Regarding the Code of Ethics. Ethics and Behavior 19 (1):60 – 78.
Andrew Collier (2003). On Christian Belief: A Defence of a Cognitive Conception of Religious Belief in a Christian Context. Routledge.
Stephen Kalberg (1990). The Rationalization of Action in Max Weber's Sociology of Religion. Sociological Theory 8 (1):58-84.
Matthew Kennedy (2009). Heirs of Nothing: The Implications of Transparency. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79 (3):574-604.
Added to index2011-12-23
Total downloads433 ( #2,905 of 1,906,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)105 ( #2,362 of 1,906,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?