A Kantian theory of welfare? [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Studies 130 (3):603 - 617 (2006)
Two main foundations have been proposed for the side-constraints that deontologists think make it sometimes wrong to do what will have the best effects. Thomist views agree with consequentialism that the bearers of value are always states of affairs, but hold that alongside the duty to promote good states are stronger duties not to choose against them.1 Kantian views locate the relevant values in persons, saying it is respect for persons rather than for any state that makes it wrong to kill, lie, and so on.2 The central innovation of Stephen Darwall’s Welfare and Rational Care is to extend this Kantian idea from side-constraints to the concept of welfare, or of what is good for a person.3 As a good-to-be-promoted, welfare is usually understood as located in states of affairs. Darwall agrees that a person’s welfare involves her being in certain states, but argues that the value in these states derives from her value as a person. More specifically, his “rational care” theory of welfare equates a person’s welfare with those states it would be rational to want for her insofar as one cared for her for her sake, so an attitude to her is primary and to her states is derivative. Whereas standard theories take the concept of welfare to come first and define care as a desire for that, Darwall reverses this ordering.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Epistemology Logic Philosophy of Mind Philosophy of Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Guy Fletcher (2012). Resisting Buck-Passing Accounts of Prudential Value. Philosophical Studies 157 (1):77-91.
Connie S. Rosati (2009). Relational Good and the Multiplicity Problem. Philosophical Issues 19 (1):205-234.
Similar books and articles
Alan E. Fuchs (1991). Posthumous Satisfactions and the Individual Welfare. Journal of Philosophical Research 16:345-351.
Dorian R. Woods (2006). What a State She's In! Western Welfare States and Equitable Social Entitlements. Journal of Global Ethics 2 (2):197 – 212.
Peter Vallentyne (1995). Taking Justice Too Seriously. Utilitas 7 (2):207-216.
Tom Sorell (2001). CitizenâPatient/CitizenâDoctor. Health Care Analysis 9 (1):25-39.
Richard J. Arneson (2004). Stephen Darwall, Welfare and Rational Care:Welfare and Rational Care. Ethics 114 (4):815-819.
James W. Yeates (2010). Death is a Welfare Issue. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):229-241.
Norman P. Barry (1990). The Philosophy of the Welfare State. Critical Review 4 (4):545-568.
Susan Wolf (2006). Deconstructing Welfare: Reflections on Stephen Darwall's Welfare and Rational Care. Utilitas 18 (4):415-426.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads70 ( #61,248 of 1,907,461 )
Recent downloads (6 months)16 ( #39,801 of 1,907,461 )
How can I increase my downloads?