David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 20:35-53 (1986)
Our understanding of the moral philosophy of Aristotle is hampered by a number of modern assumptions we make about the subject. For a start, we are accustomed to thinking about ethics or moral philosophy as being concerned with theoretical questions about actions—what makes an action right or wrong? Modern moral philosophy gives two different sorts of answers to this question. One is in terms of a substantial ethical theory—what makes an action right or wrong is whether it promotes the greatest happiness, or whether it is in accordance with or violates a moral rule, or whether it promotes or violates a moral right. The other sort gives a meta-ethical answer—rightness and wrongness are not really properties of actions, but in describing actions as right or wrong we commend or object to them, express our approval or disapproval or our emotions concerning them. But the ancient Greeks start with a totally different question. Ethics is supposed to answer, for each one of us, the question ‘How am I to live well?’ What this question means calls for some discussion
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rosalind Hursthouse (2006). The Central Doctrine of the Mean. In Richard Kraut (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Blackwell Pub.. 96--115.
Uri D. Leibowitz (2013). Particularism in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (2):121-147.
Jon Miller (ed.) (2011). Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Catherine Osborne (2007). Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics – Gabriel Richardson Lear. [REVIEW] Philosophical Investigations 30 (1):92–96.
S. Alexander (1893). Book Review:Notes on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. J. A. Stewart; The Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. J. E. C. Welldon. [REVIEW] Ethics 4 (1):123-.
Aristotle (2006/1998). Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press, USA.
István Pieter Bejczy (ed.) (2008). Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, 1200 -1500. Brill.
Gwenaëlle Aubry (2009). Nicomachean Ethics VII. 14 (1154a22-B34) : The Pain of the Living and Divine Pleasure. In Carlo Natali (ed.), Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Dorothea Frede (2009). Nicomachean Ethics VIII. 11-12: Pleasure. In Carlo Natali (ed.), Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, Book Vii: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford University Press.
Sarah Broadie (2009). Nicomachean Ethics VII. 8-9 (1151b22) : Akrasia, Enkrateia, and Look-Alikes. In Carlo Natali (ed.), Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Christof Rapp (2009). Nicomachean Ethics VII. 13-14 (1154a21) : Pleasure and Eudaimonia. In Carlo Natali (ed.), Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Teun Tieleman (2009). Nicomachean Ethics VII. 9 (1151b23)-10 : (In)Continence in Context. In Carlo Natali (ed.), Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Carlo Natali (2009). Nicomachean Ethics VII. 5-6 : Beastliness, Irascibility, Akrasia. In Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2012-02-10
Total downloads14 ( #134,543 of 1,692,918 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #193,926 of 1,692,918 )
How can I increase my downloads?