David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Cambridge University Press (1999)
This book explores the thesis that legal roles force people to engage in moral combat, an idea which is implicit in the assumption that citizens may be morally required to disobey unjust laws, while judges may be morally required to punish citizens for civil disobedience. Heidi Hurd advances the surprising argument that the law cannot require us to do what morality forbids. The 'role-relative' understanding of morality is shown to be incompatible with both consequentialist and deontological moral philosophies. In the end, Hurd shows that our best moral theory is one which never makes one actor's moral success turn on another's moral failure. Moral Combat is a sophisticated, well-conceived and carefully argued book on a very important and controversial topic at the junction between legal and political philosophy. It will be of interest to moral, legal, and political philosophers, as well as teachers and students of professional ethics in law.
|Keywords||Law and ethics Ethical relativism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$5.80 used (96% off) $24.95 new (82% off) $139.00 direct from Amazon Amazon page|
|Call number||K247.6.H87 1999|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Michael Moore & Heidi Hurd (2011). Punishing the Awkward, the Stupid, the Weak, and the Selfish: The Culpability of Negligence. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (2):147-198.
Michael S. Moore (2012). The Various Relations Between Law and Morality in Contemporary Legal Philosophy. Ratio Juris 25 (4):435-471.
Anthony R. Reeves (2015). Practical Reason and Legality: Instrumental Political Authority Without Exclusion. Law and Philosophy 34 (3):257-298.
Antony Hatzistavrou (2012). Motivation, Reconsideration and Exclusionary Reasons. Ratio Juris 25 (3):318-342.
Similar books and articles
John W. Cook (1999). Morality and Cultural Differences. Oxford University Press.
Thaddeus Metz (2001). Review of Heidi Hurd, Moral Combat. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 110 (3):434-436.
Kent Greenawalt (1987). Conflicts of Law and Morality. Oxford University Press.
Paul Smith (2008). Moral and Political Philosophy: Key Issues, Concepts and Theories. Palgrave Macmillan.
Piero Pinzauti (2012). The Autonomy of Morality From Religion. The End of Religion and of Relativism. Howard Mounce on Peter Winch. Philosophical Investigations 35 (2):154-166.
Roger Cotterrell (2000). Common Law Approaches to the Relationship Between Law and Morality. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (1):9-26.
Timothy Endicott (2010). Morality and the Making of Law: Four Questions. Jurisprudence 1 (2):267-275.
N. E. Simmonds (2007). Law as a Moral Idea. Oxford University Press.
Matthew H. Kramer (2008). Where Law and Morality Meet. Oxford University Press.
Adela Cortina (2000). Civil Ethics and the Validity of Law. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (1):39-55.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads15 ( #265,074 of 1,938,961 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #458,476 of 1,938,961 )
How can I increase my downloads?