Moral combat

New York: Cambridge University Press (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This book explores the thesis that legal roles force people to engage in moral combat, an idea which is implicit in the assumption that citizens may be morally required to disobey unjust laws, while judges may be morally required to punish citizens for civil disobedience. Heidi Hurd advances the surprising argument that the law cannot require us to do what morality forbids. The 'role-relative' understanding of morality is shown to be incompatible with both consequentialist and deontological moral philosophies. In the end, Hurd shows that our best moral theory is one which never makes one actor's moral success turn on another's moral failure. Moral Combat is a sophisticated, well-conceived and carefully argued book on a very important and controversial topic at the junction between legal and political philosophy. It will be of interest to moral, legal, and political philosophers, as well as teachers and students of professional ethics in law.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,221

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Morality and cultural differences.John Webber Cook - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Where law and morality meet.Matthew H. Kramer - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Law as a moral idea.Nigel Simmonds - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Conflicts of law and morality.Kent Greenawalt (ed.) - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Review of Heidi Hurd, Moral Combat. [REVIEW]Thaddeus Metz - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (3):434-436.
Civil ethics and the validity of law.Adela Cortina - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (1):39-55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
41 (#337,985)

6 months
3 (#439,386)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?