David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Synthese 86 (2):173 - 196 (1991)
Among various cases that equally admit of evidentialist reasoning, the supposedly evidentialist solution has varying degrees of intuitive attractiveness. I suggest that cooperative reasoning may account for the appeal of apparently evidentialist behavior in the cases in which it is intuitively attractive, while the inapplicability of cooperative reasoning may account for the unattractiveness of evidentialist behaviour in other cases. A collective causal power with respect to agreed outcomes, not evidentialist reasoning, makes cooperation attractive in the Prisoners' Dilemma. And a natural though unwarranted assumption of such a power may account for the intuitive appeal of the one-box response in Newcomb's Problem.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Richmond Campbell & Lanning Snowden (eds.) (1985). Paradoxes of Rationality and Cooperation: Prisoner's Dilemma and Newcomb's Problem. University of British Columbia Press.
J. V. Howard (1988). Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma. Theory and Decision 24 (3):203-213.
S. L. Hurley (1989). Natural Reasons: Personality and Polity. Oxford University Press.
Isaac Levi (1982). A Note on Newcombmania. Journal of Philosophy 79 (6):337-342.
Isaac Levi (1975). Newcomb's Many Problems. Theory and Decision 6 (2):161-175.
Citations of this work BETA
Christopher Woodard (2011). Rationality and the Unit of Action. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (2):261-277.
Similar books and articles
Daniel R. Gilbert Jr (1996). The Prisoner's Dilemma and the Prisoners of the Prisoner's Dilemma. Business Ethics Quarterly 6 (2):165-178.
Christoph Schmidt-Petri (2005). Newcomb's Problem and Repeated Prisoners' Dilemmas. Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1160-1173.
Reed Richter (1985). Rationality, Group Choice and Expected Utility. Synthese 63 (2):203 - 232.
A. D. Irvine (1993). How Braess' Paradox Solves Newcomb's Problem. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (2):141 – 160.
Arthur L. Stinchcombe (1980). V. Is the Prisoners' Dilemma All of Sociology? Inquiry 23 (2):187 – 192.
Wlodek Rabinowicz (1993). Cooperating with Cooperators. Erkenntnis 38 (1):23 - 55.
David Lewis (1979). Prisoners' Dilemma is a Newcomb Problem. Philosophy and Public Affairs 8 (3):235-240.
S. L. Hurley (1994). A New Take From Nozick on Newcomb's Problem and Prisoners' Dilemma. Analysis 54 (2):65 - 72.
Jordan Howard Sobel (1991). Some Versions of Newcomb's Problem Are Prisoners' Dilemmas. Synthese 86 (2):197 - 208.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #41,748 of 1,413,277 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,925 of 1,413,277 )
How can I increase my downloads?