David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (4):393-407 (2004)
This paper is a polemic against the science of linguistics, to the extent that, with its relentlessly reductive methodologies, it has encouraged the marginalization of the aesthetic in literary studies—particularly in the field of metrics. The paper also suggests how this aesthetic imperative might yet be reclaimed through study of the audible reading of poetry.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marjorie Perloff (1996). Wittgenstein's Ladder: Poetic Language and the Strangeness of the Ordinary. University of Chicago Press.
Kalliopi Nikolopoulou (2009). Plato and Hegel on an Old Quarrel. Epoché 13 (2):249-266.
Zong-qi Cai (1999). In Quest of Harmony: Plato and Confucius on Poetry. Philosophy East and West 49 (3):317-345.
Peter Lamarque (2009). The Elusiveness of Poetic Meaning. Ratio 22 (4):398-420.
Lawrence F. Rhu (2006). Stanley Cavell's American Dream: Shakespeare, Philosophy, and Hollywood Movies. Fordham University Press.
Laura Penny (2008). The Highest of All the Arts: Kant and Poetry. Philosophy and Literature 32 (2):pp. 373-384.
Casey O'Callaghan (2011). Hearing Properties, Effects or Parts? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (3pt3):375-405.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #118,255 of 1,004,529 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #64,617 of 1,004,529 )
How can I increase my downloads?