Graduate studies at Western
Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):193-212 (2012)
|Abstract||Abstract The rapidly growing presence of private military and security contractors (PMSCs) in armed conflict and post-conflict situations in the last decade brought corresponding incidents of serious misconduct by PMSC personnel. The two most infamous events?one involving the firm formerly known as Blackwater and the other involving Titan and CACI?engendered scrutiny of available mechanisms for criminal and civil accountability of the individuals whose misconduct caused the harm. Along a parallel track, scholars and policymakers began examining the responsibility of states and international organizations for the harm that occurred. Both approaches have primarily focused on post-conduct accountability?of the individuals who caused the harm, of the state in which the harm occurred, or of the state or organization that hired the PMSC whose personnel caused the harm. Less attention, however, has been paid to the idea of pre-conduct accountability for PMSCs and their personnel. A broad understanding of ?accountability for? PMSCs and their personnel encompasses not only responsibility for harm caused by conduct, but responsibility for hiring, hosting, and monitoring these entities, as well as responsibility to the victims of the harm. This article provides a comprehensive approach for analyzing the existing international legal regime, and whether and to what extent the legal regime provides ?accountability for? PMSCs and their personnel. It does so by proposing a practical construct of three phases based on PMSC operations?Contracting, In-the-Field, and Post-Conduct?with which to assess the various bodies of international law|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marcus Hedahl (2012). Unaccountable: The Current State of Private Military and Security Companies. Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):175-192.
Don Mayer (2009). Peaceful Warriors: Private Military Security Companies and the Quest for Stable Societies. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (4):387 - 401.
Benjamin Perrin (2012). Mind the Gap: Lacunae in the International Legal Framework Governing Private Military and Security Companies. Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):213-232.
Nigel D. White (2012). Due Diligence Obligations of Conduct: Developing a Responsibility Regime for PMSCs. Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):233-261.
David M. Malone & James Cockayne, The UN Security Council: 10 Lessons From Iraq on Regulation and Accountability.
George Andreopoulos & Shawna Brandle (2012). Revisiting the Role of Private Military and Security Companies. Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):138-157.
Frederic Megret, The Vicarious Responsibility of the United Nations for 'Unintended Consequences of Peace Operations'.
Andrew Alexandra (2012). Private Military and Security Companies and the Liberal Conception of Violence. Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):158-174.
Deane-Peter Baker & James Pattison (2011). The Principled Case for Employing Private Military and Security Companies in Interventions for Human Rights Purposes. Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):1-18.
José L. Gómez del Prado (2012). A U.N. Convention to Regulate PMSCs? Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):262-286.
Lucas (2009). Pirates and PMCs. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (1):87-94.
Ana Filipa Vrdoljak, Cultural Rights: The Possible Impact of Private Military and Security Companies.
Leif Wenar (2006). Accountability in International Development Aid. Ethics and International Affairs 20 (1):1–23.
Allison Stanger (2012). Transparency as a Core Public Value and Mechanism of Compliance. Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (3):287-301.
J. Pattison (2012). The Legitimacy of the Military, Private Military and Security Companies, and Just War Theory. European Journal of Political Theory 11 (2):131-154.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2012-11-13
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?