David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (3):145 – 156 (1994)
Private information about individuals contained in computerized data bases is readily available to journalists, who have a moral obligation to inform the masses as a means of redistributing power in society. The journalist's duty to inform, however, conflicts with the duty to respect the privacy of individuals. Because legislation is largely ineffective in protecting individual privacy, the journalist's moral responsibility assumes additional weight. However, the journalist should not allow the claim of privacy to keep him or her from investigating matters in which the public has a legitimate interest. To determine the extent of legitimate interest, the journalist must be able to distinguish between a right to knowledge and a curious interest in knowing. The journalist is offered a 5-point test to assist in determining when an invasion of privacy via data-base research and subsequent publication is warranted.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Sissela Bok (1982/1984). Secrets: On the Ethics of Concealment and Revelation. Oxford University Press.
Immanuel Kant (2009). Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. Oxford University Press.
Christopher Meyers (1993). Justifying Journalistic Harms: Right to Know Vs. Interest in Knowing. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 8 (3):133 – 146.
W. D. Ross (1954/1978). Kant's Ethical Theory: A Commentary on the Grundlegung Zur Metaphysik Der Sitten. Greenwood Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Kim Walsh-Childers, Norman P. Lewis & Jeffrey Neely (2011). Listeners, Not Leeches: What Virginia Tech Survivors Needed From Journalists. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 26 (3):191 - 205.
Similar books and articles
Lars Oystein Ursin (2010). Privacy and Property in the Biobank Context. HEC Forum 22 (3):211-224.
Lars Øystein Ursin (2008). Biobank Research and the Right to Privacy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (4):267-285.
Jay Black (1994). Privacy in America: The Frontier of Duty and Restraint. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (4):213 – 234.
David Meeler (2008). Is Information All We Need to Protect? The Monist 91 (1):151-169.
Peter Hustinx (2010). Privacy by Design: Delivering the Promises. [REVIEW] Identity in the Information Society 3 (2):253-255.
Norman Mooradian (2009). The Importance of Privacy Revisited. Ethics and Information Technology 11 (3):163-174.
Alan Rubel (2011). The Particularized Judgment Account of Privacy. Res Publica 17 (3):275-290.
Judith Wagner DeCew (2004). Privacy and Policy for Genetic Research. Ethics and Information Technology 6 (1):5-14.
Wendell Cochran (1996). Computers, Privacy, and Journalists: A Suggested Code of Information Practices. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 11 (4):210 – 222.
Louis Hodges (1994). The Journalist and Privacy. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 9 (4):197 – 212.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads28 ( #72,804 of 1,679,436 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #39,597 of 1,679,436 )
How can I increase my downloads?