David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2010)
Does criminal liability require an act? -- Motive and criminal liability -- The costs to criminal theory of supposing that intentions are irrelevant to permissibility -- Transferred intent -- The nature and justifiability of nonconsummate offenses -- Strict liability, justice, and proportionality -- The sequential principle of relative culpability -- Willful ignorance, knowledge, and the equal culpability thesis : a study of the significance of the principle of legality -- Rapes without rapists : consent and reasonable mistake -- Mistake of law and culpability -- On the supposed priority of justification to excuse -- Partial defenses -- The "but everybody does that!" defense -- The de minimis "defense" to criminal liability -- Why punish the deserving -- Malum prohibitum and retributivism -- Already punished enough.
|Keywords||Criminal law Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$39.89 used (70% off) $43.87 new (67% off) $54.84 direct from Amazon (58% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||K5018.H873 2010|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Kevin Lynch (2016). Willful Ignorance and Self-Deception. Philosophical Studies 173 (2):505-523.
Douglas Husak (2011). Negligence, Belief, Blame and Criminal Liability: The Special Case of Forgetting. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (2):199-218.
Susan Dimock (2011). What Are Intoxicated Offenders Responsible For? The “Intoxication Defense” Re-Examined. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):1-20.
Larry Alexander (2013). You Got What You Deserved. Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):309-319.
Susan Dimock (2012). Intoxication and the Act/Control/Agency Requirement. Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):341-362.
Similar books and articles
Larry May & Zachary Hoskins (eds.) (2010). International Criminal Law and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Douglas Husak (2008). Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
Antony Duff (2007). Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law. Hart Pub..
Antony Duff (2009). Legal and Moral Responsibility. Philosophy Compass 4 (6):978-986.
Douglas Husak (2009). The Costs to Criminal Theory of Supposing That Intentions Are Irrelevant to Permissibility. Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1):51-70.
Michael S. Moore (1993). Act and Crime: The Philosophy of Action and its Implications for Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Michael J. Gorr & Sterling Harwood (eds.) (1992). Controversies in Criminal Law: Philosophical Essays on Responsibility and Procedure. Westview Press.
John Gardner (2007). Offences and Defences: Selected Essays in the Philosophy of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
A. P. Simester & A. T. H. Smith (eds.) (1996). Harm and Culpability. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-05-19
Total downloads36 ( #112,833 of 1,907,219 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #276,350 of 1,907,219 )
How can I increase my downloads?