David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2010)
Does criminal liability require an act? -- Motive and criminal liability -- The costs to criminal theory of supposing that intentions are irrelevant to permissibility -- Transferred intent -- The nature and justifiability of nonconsummate offenses -- Strict liability, justice, and proportionality -- The sequential principle of relative culpability -- Willful ignorance, knowledge, and the equal culpability thesis : a study of the significance of the principle of legality -- Rapes without rapists : consent and reasonable mistake -- Mistake of law and culpability -- On the supposed priority of justification to excuse -- Partial defenses -- The "but everybody does that!" defense -- The de minimis "defense" to criminal liability -- Why punish the deserving -- Malum prohibitum and retributivism -- Already punished enough.
|Keywords||Criminal law Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$103.45 new (22% off) $104.89 used (21% off) $125.40 direct from Amazon (5% off) Amazon page|
|Call number||K5018.H873 2010|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Douglas Husak (2011). Negligence, Belief, Blame and Criminal Liability: The Special Case of Forgetting. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (2):199-218.
Stephen P. Garvey (2013). Was Ellen Wronged? Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):185-216.
Susan Dimock (2011). What Are Intoxicated Offenders Responsible For? The “Intoxication Defense” Re-Examined. Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):1-20.
Larry Alexander (2013). You Got What You Deserved. Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):309-319.
Douglas Husak (2013). The Philosophy of Criminal Law: Extending the Debates. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):351-365.
Similar books and articles
Larry May & Zachary Hoskins (eds.) (2010). International Criminal Law and Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Douglas Husak (2008). Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
Antony Duff (2007). Answering for Crime: Responsibility and Liability in the Criminal Law. Hart Pub..
Antony Duff (2009). Legal and Moral Responsibility. Philosophy Compass 4 (6):978-986.
Douglas Husak (2009). The Costs to Criminal Theory of Supposing That Intentions Are Irrelevant to Permissibility. Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1):51-70.
Michael S. Moore (1993). Act and Crime: The Philosophy of Action and its Implications for Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
Michael J. Gorr & Sterling Harwood (eds.) (1992). Controversies in Criminal Law: Philosophical Essays on Responsibility and Procedure. Westview Press.
John Gardner (2007). Offences and Defences: Selected Essays in the Philosophy of Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
A. P. Simester & A. T. H. Smith (eds.) (1996). Harm and Culpability. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-05-19
Total downloads22 ( #65,979 of 1,089,063 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,063 )
How can I increase my downloads?