David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):565-576 (2011)
Wittgenstein expressed an antipathy to modernism from his earliest work to his latest. He connected modernism with modern science and with what hecalled “the causal point of view.” The causal point of view, which operates like a presupposition or pre-dispositional attitude, blocks a clear vision of the richnessand complexity of the world and human life, and denies access to a religious point of view and the benefits of faith. His analysis of the causal point of view lays bare the uncritically accepted place it holds in our thinking and helps to relieve the anxiety felt over the idea of causal necessity that accompanies it. Wittgenstein’sworld-view and larger philosophical tasks are often easily lost in the details of his analyses and remarks, but not here as he unpacks the reasons for his discomfiture with the assumptions of the modern world
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jennifer Hornsby (1993). Agency and Causal Explanation. In John Heil & Alfred R. Mele (eds.), Mental Causation. Oxford University Press.
Sheldon R. Smith (2007). Causation and Its Relation to 'Causal Laws'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 58 (4):659 - 688.
David H. Sanford (1983). Impartial Perception. Philosophy 58 (225):392 - 395.
Leen De Vreese (2006). Causal Pluralism and Scientific Knowledge: An Underexposed Problem. Philosophica 77.
Susan Wolf (1999). Morality and the View From Here. Journal of Ethics 3 (3):203-223.
Carlos Mario Muñoz-Suárez & René J. Campis (2008). Did I Do It? Yeah, You Did! On Wittgenstein and Libet on Free Will. In Hannes Leitgeb & Alexander Hieke (eds.), Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences: Papers of the 31st International Wittgenstein Symposium. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.
Rachel Cohon (1997). The Common Point of View in Hume's Ethics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):827-850.
John I. Biro (2006). A Point of View on Points of View. Philosophical Psychology 19 (1):3-12.
Muñoz-Suárez Carlos M. & Campis René J. (2008). DID I DO IT? -YEAH, YOU DID! Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences:34- 37.
John Bishop (1990). Natural Agency: An Essay on the Causal Theory of Action. Cambridge University Press.
Erik Weber (2008). The Debate Between Causal Realism and Causal Constructivism: Metaphilosophical Reflections. Philosophica 81.
Paul Coates (1998). Perception and Metaphysical Skepticism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 72 (72):1-28.
Sandra Laugier (2000). Wittgenstein, la subjectivité et la "voix intérieure". Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2.
Michael Clark & Nicholas Shackel (2006). The Dr. Psycho Paradox and Newcomb's Problem. Erkenntnis 64 (1):85 - 100.
Mathias Frisch (2010). Causal Models and the Asymmetry of State Preparation. In Mauricio Suarez, Mauro Dorato & Miklos Redei (eds.), Epsa Philosophical Issues in the Sciences. Springer. 75--85.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads5 ( #256,176 of 1,410,432 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #75,847 of 1,410,432 )
How can I increase my downloads?