Graduate studies at Western
Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):399-410 (2012)
|Abstract||Gideon Yaffe is to be commended for beginning his exhaustive treatment by asking a surprisingly difficult question: Why punish attempts at all? He addresses this inquiry in the context of defending (what he calls) the transfer principle: “If a particular form of conduct is legitimately criminalized, then the attempt to engage in that form of conduct is also legitimately criminalized.” I begin by expressing a few reservations about the transfer principle itself. But my main point is that we are justified in punishing attempts only when and for a different reason than Yaffe provides. I argue that attempts are legitimately punished only when they raise the risk that a harm will actually occur. To overcome the problems my explanation encounters with factually impossible attempts, I suggest an account of risk that relies on ordinary language and possible worlds|
|Keywords||Attempts Risk Possible worlds Factual impossibility Legal impossibility Inherent impossibility Yaffe Double inchoate crimes|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Alexander Sarch (forthcoming). Two Objections to Yaffe on the Criminalization of Attempts. Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-19.
Alec Walen (2012). Potholes on the Path to Purity: Gideon Yaffe's Overly Ambitious Attempt to Account for Criminal Attempts. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):383-386.
Gideon Yaffe (2012). More Attempts: A Reply to Duff, Husak, Mele and Walen. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):429-444.
R. A. Duff (2012). Symposium: Gideon Yaffe's Attempts. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):381-381.
Amir S. Tabandeh (1994). Characterising Artificial Intelligence Technology for International Transfer. AI and Society 8 (4):315-325.
Steven Tudor (2012). Attempts in the Philosophy of Action and the Criminal Law – By Gideon Yaffe. Journal of Applied Philosophy 29 (1):84-86.
Hamish Stewart (2009). The Limits of the Harm Principle. Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):17-35.
Patrick A. Wilson (1991). What Is the Explanandum of the Anthropic Principle? American Philosophical Quarterly 28 (2):167 - 173.
Phillip John Meadows (2011). Contemporary Arguments for a Geometry of Visual Experience. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):408-430.
Nancy J. Nersessian (1991). The Method to "Meaning": A Reply to Leplin. Philosophy of Science 58 (4):678-686.
Manuel Liz Gutiérrez (2007). Enabling Relations As a Way to Transfer Causal Sufficiency. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:87-93.
Gideon Yaffe (1999). 'Ought' Implies 'Can' and the Principle of Alternate Possibilities. Analysis 59 (3):218-222.
Added to index2012-03-15
Total downloads16 ( #81,785 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?