David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Papers 32 (3):345-361 (2003)
This paper builds on the insights of Jerome Bruner by underlining the central importance of narratives explaining actions in terms of reasons, arguing that by giving due attention to the central roles that narratives play in our everyday understanding of others provides a better way of explicating the nature and source of that activity than does simulation theory, theory-theory or some union of the two. However, although I promote Bruner’s basic claims about the roles narratives play in this everyday enterprise, I take issue with his characterization of the nature of narrative itself. In so doing, important questions are brought to the fore about what makes our understanding of narratives possible. In line with the idea that we ought to tell a developmental story that looks to a the social arena for the source of narratives about reasons, I promote the idea that what is minimally required for becoming conversant in such everyday narratives need not be anything as sophisticated as a theory of mind or a capacity for simulation. The paper concludes using evidence concerning autism as a test case to help support this conclusion.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Daniel D. Hutto (2003). Folk Psychological Narratives and the Case of Autism. Philosophical Papers 32 (3):345-361.
Daniel D. Hutto (2009). Folk Psychology as Narrative Practice. Journal of Consciousness Studies 16 (6-8):6 - 8.
Daniel D. Hutto (2007). Narrative and Understanding Persons. In Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements. 1-.
C. Behan McCullagh (2000). The Structure and Objectivity of Historical Narratives. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:145-158.
Daniel D. Hutto (2007). The Narrative Practice Hypothesis: Origins and Applications of Folk Psychology. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 82 (60):43-68.
Byron Almén (2008). A Theory of Musical Narrative. Indiana University Press.
Tadeusz Zawidzki (2009). Folk Psychological Narratives: The Sociocultural Basis of Understanding Reasons – by Daniel D. Hutto. Philosophical Investigations 32 (2):183-187.
George D. Randels (1998). The Contingency of Business: Narrative, Metaphor, and Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (12):1299 - 1310.
George D. Randels Jr (1998). The Contingency of Business: Narrative, Metaphor, and Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (12):1299 - 1310.
Jean-Pierre Dupuy (2010). The Narratology of Lay Ethics. NanoEthics 4 (2):153-170.
Daniel D. Hutto (2011). Understanding Fictional Minds Without Theory of Mind! Style 45 (2):276-282.
Daniel D. Hutto (2008). Limited Engagements and Narrative Extensions. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 16 (3):419 – 444.
Daniel Hunt & Ronald Carter (2012). Seeing Through The Bell Jar: Investigating Linguistic Patterns of Psychological Disorder. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities 33 (1):27-39.
T. Uebel (2012). Narratives and Action Explanation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 42 (1):31-67.
Daniel D. Hutto (2007). Folk Psychology Without Theory or Simulation. In D. Hutto & M. Ratcliffe (eds.), Folk Psychology Reassessed. Springer. 115--135.
Added to index2010-10-30
Total downloads33 ( #56,576 of 1,101,802 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,762 of 1,101,802 )
How can I increase my downloads?