David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 5 (2):262-282 (2012)
Plotinus maintains that our intellect is always thinking. This is due to his view that our intellect remains in the intelligible world and shares a natural kinship with the hypostasis Intellect, whose being and activity consists in eternal contemplation of the Forms. Moreover, Plotinus maintains that although our intellect is always thinking we do not always apprehend our thoughts. This is due to his view that “we“ descend into the sensible world while our intellect remains in the intelligible world. Furthermore, Plotinus maintains that it is only when logoi unfold the content of our thoughts into the imagination that we apprehend them. This is due to a complex account between, on the one hand, the relationship between intellect and discursive reasoning, and on the other hand, the relationship between discursive reasoning and language. Plotinus tells this story with remarkable brevity in Ennead 4.3.30. In this paper I explain the role the imagination plays in the apprehension of thoughts through a close analysis of this treatise in connection with Ennead 1.4.10
|Keywords||apprehension thought consciousness imagination Plotinus|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
I. Crystal (1998). Plotinus on the Structure of Self-Intellection. Phronesis 43 (3):264 - 286.
Ian Crystal (1998). Plotinus on the Structure of Self-Intellection. Phronesis 43 (3):264-286.
Marilena Vlad (2007). De l'unité de l'intellect à l'un absolu. Chôra 5:121-139.
Eric D. Perl (2009). The Good of the Intellect. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 83:25-39.
Plotinus (1949). [Enneads]. Boston, C. T. Branford Co..
Eyjólfur Kjalar Emilsson (2007). Plotinus on Intellect. Oxford University Press.
Michael Atkinson (1983). Plotinus, Ennead V. 1: On the Three Principal Hypostases: A Commentary with Translation. Oxford University Press.
Riccardo Chiaradonna (2012). Plotinus' Account of the Cognitive Powers of the Soul: Sense Perception and Discursive Thought. [REVIEW] Topoi 31 (2):191-207.
Ota Gál (2011). Unitas Multiplex as the Basis of Plotinus' Conception of Beauty. Estetika 48 (2):172-198.
Naly Thaler (2011). Traces of Good in Plotinus's Philosophy of Nature: Ennead VI.7.1-141. Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (2).
Richard C. Taylor (2006). Abstraction in Al-Fârâbî. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:151-168.
Kurt Pritzl (2006). The Place of Intellect in Aristotle. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:57-75.
John Bussanich (2008). Plotinus on Intellect (E.K.) Emilsson Plotinus on Intellect. Pp. Viii + 232. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2007. Cased, £35. ISBN: 978-0-19-928170-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 58 (02):439-.
Andriy Vasylchenko (1999). Apprehensio Simplex in the Kiev-Mohyla Academy. Theoria 14 (1):11-24.
Suzanne Stern-Gillet (2000). Le Principe Du Beau Chez Plotin: Réflexions sur "Enneas" VI.7.32 et 33. Phronesis 45 (1):38 - 63.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-09-23
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?