The Antidosis of Isocrates and Aristotle's Protrepticus
| Abstract | Isocrates' Antidosis ("Defense against the Exchange") and Aristotle's Protrepticus ("Exhortation to Philosophy") were recovered from oblivion in the late nineteenth century. In this article we demonstrate that the two texts happen to be directly related. Aristotle's Protrepticus was a response, on behalf of the Academy, to Isocrates' criticism of the Academy and its theoretical preoccupations. Contents: I. Introduction: Protrepticus, text and context II. Authentication of the Protrepticus of Aristotle III. Isocrates and philosophy in Athens in the 4th century IV. The Protrepticus of Aristotle as a response to the Antidosis of Isocrates V. Conclusion: dueling conceptions of philosophy, still dueling. | |||||||||
| Keywords | Aristotle Isocrates Plato | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
|
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Monte Ransome Johnson & D. S. Hutchinson (2005). Authenticating Aristotle's Protrepticus. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29:193-294.
Rachel Barney (2010). Gorgias' Defense: Plato and His Opponents on Rhetoric and the Good. Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (1):95-121.
Robert G. Sullivan (2009). Isocrates (Y.L.) Too A Commentary on Isocrates' Antidosis. Pp. X + 254. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2008. Cased, £50. ISBN: 978-0-19-923807-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 59 (02):370-.
D. J. Allan (1959). Aristotle's Protrepticus W. Gerson Rabinowitz: Aristotle's Protrepticus and the Sources of its Reconstruction. (Publ. In Classical Archaeology, Vol. 16, No. 1.) Pp. 95. Berkeley: University of California Press (London: Cambridge University Press), 1957. Paper, $2. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 9 (02):124-127.
Christopher Bobonich (2007). Why Should Philosophers Rule? Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Protrepticus. Social Philosophy and Policy 24 (2):153-175.
Charles W. Marsh Jr (2001). Public Relations Ethics: Contrasting Models From the Rhetorics of Plato, Aristotle, and Isocrates. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 16 (2 & 3):78 – 98.
Charles W. Marsh Jr (2001). Public Relations Ethics: Contrasting Models From the Rhetorics of Plato, Aristotle, and Isocrates. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 16 (2 & 3):78 – 98.
Charles Marsh (2001). Public Relations Ethics: Contrasting Models From the Rhetorics of Plato, Aristotle, and Isocrates. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 16 (2-3):78-98.
K. Kapparis (1994). Two Speeches of Isocrates S. Usher: Isocrates, Panegyricus and To Nicocles. (Greek Orators, III.) Pp. Iv + 219. Warminster: Aris and Phillips, 1990. £32 (Paper, £12.50). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 44 (01):23-24.
D. J. Allan (1959). Aristotle's Protrepticus. The Classical Review 9 (02):124-.
Felix M. Cleve (1966). Aristotle: Protrepticus. The New Scholasticism 40 (1):123-125.
W. Wayte (1895). Freese's Translation of Isocrates The Orations of Isocrates, Translated by J. H. Freese, M.A., Formerly Fellow of St. John's College, Cambridge. With Introduction and Notes. Vol. I. London: G. Bell and Sons, 1894. 5s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 9 (02):125-126.
Matthew Walker (2010). The Utility of Contemplation in Aristotle's Protrepticus. Ancient Philosophy 30 (1):135-153.
Michael Haslam (1989). Comparative Worth in Aristotle's Protrepticus. Phronesis 34 (1):109-110.
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2010-12-22Total downloads43 ( #26,191 of 549,122 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,361 of 549,122 )How can I increase my downloads? |

