David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008)
The sorites paradox is the name given to a class of paradoxical arguments, also known as little by little arguments, which arise as a result of the indeterminacy surrounding limits of application of the predicates involved. For example, the concept of a heap appears to lack sharp boundaries and, as a consequence of the subsequent indeterminacy surrounding the extension of the predicate ‘is a heap’, no one grain of wheat can be identified as making the difference between being a heap and not being a heap. Given then that one grain of wheat does not make a heap, it would seem to follow that two do not, thus three do not, and so on. In the end it would appear that no amount of wheat can make a heap. We are faced with paradox since from apparently true premises by seemingly uncontroversial reasoning we arrive at an apparently false conclusion.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Marcia R. Pinheiro (2006). A Solution to the Sorites. Semiotica 2006 (160):307-326.
Similar books and articles
Helen Morris Cartwright (1993). On Two Arguments for the Indeterminacy of Personal Identity. Synthese 95 (2):241-273.
Jason Stanley (2003). Context, Interest Relativity and the Sorites. Analysis 63 (4):269–281.
Ofra Magidor (2012). Strict Finitism and the Happy Sorites. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):471-491.
Roy A. Sorensen (2007). Knowledge Beyond the Margin for Error. Mind 116 (463):717 - 722.
Timothy Williamson (1994). Vagueness. Routledge.
Mark Colyvan (2010). A Topological Sorites. Journal of Philosophy 107 (6):311-325.
Colin Howson (2009). Sorites is No Threat to Modus Ponens: A Reply to Kochan. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (2):209-212.
Ulrich Pardey (2002). Unscharfe Grenzen.Über Die Haufen-Paradoxie, den Darwinismus Und Die Rekursive Grammatik. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33 (2):323-348.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #40,339 of 1,139,848 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #49,768 of 1,139,848 )
How can I increase my downloads?