Philosophy and its Epistemic Neuroses
Westview Press (2000)
|Abstract||Philosophers have often thought that concepts such as ”knowledge” and ”truth” are appropriate objects for theoretical investigation. In a discussion which ranges widely over recent analytical philosophy and radical theory, Philosophy and Its Epistemic Neuroses takes issue with this assumption, arguing that such theoreticism is not the solution but the source of traditional problems in epistemology (How can we have knowledge of the world around us? How can we have knowledge of other minds and cultures? How can we have knowledge of ourselves?) and in the philosophy of language (How can we know what our words refer to?).The author draws on Wittgenstein and recent neo-pragmatists (Putnam, Rorty, Davidson, Williams) to argue that analytical philosophy and radical theory alike stand in an ambivalent relationship with skepticism, which issues forth in varieties of ”epistemic neuroses” - manifested most clearly in the cases of metaphysical realism, relativism and causal theories of reference. Each of these projects is defined in terms possibilities that conflict with its own chances of cognitive success. Hymers explains not only the mainstream analytical philosophy of such figures as Devitt, Quine and Burge, but also structuralism (Althusser, Lacan), feminist theory (Seller, MacKinnon, Lugones) and critical theory (Marcuse), in an attempt to outline a therapeutic alternative to philosophical theoreticism.|
|Keywords||Skepticism Knowledge, Theory of|
|Buy the book||$16.99 used (44% off) $131.04 new Amazon page|
|Call number||BD201.H95 2000|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Philip P. Hanson (2004). Idealism, Scepticism, and Internal Relations: Remarks on Hymers's Philosophy and its Epistemic Neuroses. Dialogue 43 (3):577-586.
Dean Pettit (2002). Why Knowledge is Unnecessary for Understanding Language. Mind 111 (443):519-550.
Rockney Jacobsen (2002). Philosophy and Its Epistemic Neuroses Michael Hymers Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2000, Xi + 228 Pp., $60.00. [REVIEW] Dialogue 41 (01):199-.
Jim Stone (2000). Skepticism as a Theory of Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):527-545.
Evelyn Brister (2009). Feminist Epistemology, Contextualism, and Philosophical Skepticism. Metaphilosophy 40 (5):671-688.
Mark Migotti (2004). Discussion of Hymers's Philosophy and its Epistemic Neuroses. Dialogue 43 (3):587-594.
Leonard S. Carrier (2011). The Essential Tie Between Knowing and Believing: A Causal Account of Knowledge and Epistemic Reasons. Edwin Mellen Press.
Michael Hymers (2004). Précis of Philosophy and its Epistemic Neuroses. Dialogue 43 (3):569-576.
Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard (eds.) (2009). Epistemic Value. Oxford University Press.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?