Artificial language in ancient mesopotamia – a dubious and a less dubious case
Journal of Indian Philosophy (forthcoming)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesE. J. Lowe (2010). Another Dubious Counter-Example to Conditional Transitivity. Analysis 70 (2):286-289.
Monte Ransome Johnson (2008). Sources for the Philosophy of Archytas. Ancient Philosophy 28 (1):173-199.
Bernard A. Nachbahr (1978). A Dubious Heritage. Thought 53 (4):454-456.
Stephen A. Dinan (1980). A Dubious Heritage. The New Scholasticism 54 (4):522-524.
Robert C. Dentan (1955). The Idea of History in the Ancient Near East. New Haven, Yale University Press.
Derek Bickerton (2003). Language Evolution Without Evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):669-670.
David Liggins (2006). Is There a Good Epistemological Argument Against Platonism? Analysis 66 (290):135–141.
Ralph M. Miller (1976). The Dubious Case for Metaphors in Educational Writing. Educational Theory 26 (2):174-181.
Luc Bovens & EJ Olsson (2000). Coherentism, Reliability and Bayesian Networks. Mind 109 (436):685-719.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
