In defence of “hard” offers: A reply to J.p. Day
Philosophia 20 (3):325-327 (1990)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,865 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJune O'Connor (1990). Dorothy Day's Christian Conversion. Journal of Religious Ethics 18 (1):159 - 180.
Noam Chomsky (2005). Simple Truths, Hard Problems: Some Thoughts on Terror, Justice, and Self-Defence. Philosophy 80 (1):5-28.
B. A. Farrell (1972). The Validity of Psychotherapy. Inquiry 15 (1-4):146 – 170.
Michael Otsuka & Alex Voorhoeve (2011). Reply to Crisp. Utilitas 23:109-114.
Albert Casullo (2008). Defeasible a Priori Justification: A Reply to Thurow. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (231):336–343.
Kristin Demetriou (2010). The Soft-Line Solution to Pereboom's Four-Case Argument. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):595-617.
Daniel Haas (2013). In Defense of Hard-Line Replies to the Multiple-Case Manipulation Argument. Philosophical Studies 163 (3):797-811.
Matti Häyry & Timo Airaksinen (1988). Hard and Soft Offers as Constraints. Philosophia 18 (4):385-398.
J. P. Day (1990). On Häyry and Airaksinen's 'Hard and Soft Offers as Constraints'. Philosophia 20 (3):321-323.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads1 ( #277,212 of 556,807 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
