David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Foundations of Science 19 (1):35-51 (2014)
Algebraic equations in the tradition of Descartes and Frans Van Schooten accompany Christiaan Huygens’s early work on collision, which later would be reorganized and presented as De motu corporum ex percussione. Huygens produced the equations at the same time as his announcement of his rejection of Descartes’s rules of collision. Never intended for publication, the equations appear to have been used as preliminary scaffolding on which to build his critiques of Descartes’s physics. Additionally, Huygens used algebraic equations of this form to accurately predict the speeds of bodies after collision in experiments carried out at the Royal Society. Despite their deceptive simplicity, Huygens’s algebraic equations pose significant conceptual problems both mathematically and for their physical interpretation especially for negative speeds; they may very well have been the source of a new principle, the conservation of quantity of motion with direction
|Keywords||Algebra Rules of collision Christiaan Huygens René Descartes Quantity of motion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
René Descartes, Valentine Rodger Miller & Reese P. Miller (1983). Principles of Philosophy. Reidel Distributed by Kluwer Boston, C1983.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Tim O'Keefe (1996). Does Epicurus Need the Swerve as an Archê of Collisions? Phronesis 41 (3):305-317.
W. J. Blok & J. Rebagliato (2003). Algebraic Semantics for Deductive Systems. Studia Logica 74 (1-2):153 - 180.
M. Campercholi & D. Vaggione (2011). Algebraic Functions. Studia Logica 98 (1-2):285-306.
Sergiu Rudeanu & Dan A. Simovici (2006). On the Ranges of Algebraic Functions on Lattices. Studia Logica 84 (3):451 - 468.
Ludomir Newelski (1999). Geometry of *-Finite Types. Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1375-1395.
Fatima Romero Vallhonesta (2012). Algebraic Symbolism in the First Algebraic Works in the Iberian Peninsula. Philosophica 87.
Nobu-Yuki Suzuki (1989). An Algebraic Approach to Intuitionistic Modal Logics in Connection with Intermediate Predicate Logics. Studia Logica 48 (2):141 - 155.
Nicholas Maxwell (1995). A Philosopher Struggles to Understand Quantum Theory: Particle Creation and Wavepacket Reduction. In M. Ferrero & A. van der Merwe (eds.), Fundamental Problems in Quantum Physics.
Matt Insall (1996). Hyperalgebraic Primitive Elements for Relational Algebraic and Topological Algebraic Models. Studia Logica 57 (2-3):409 - 418.
Klaus Denecke & Dara Phusanga (2008). Hyperformulas and Solid Algebraic Systems. Studia Logica 90 (2):263 - 286.
Josep Maria Font & Miquel Rius (2000). An Abstract Algebraic Logic Approach to Tetravalent Modal Logics. Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):481-518.
W. J. Blok & Eva Hoogland (2006). The Beth Property in Algebraic Logic. Studia Logica 83 (1-3):49 - 90.
F. W. Sohon (1936). The Theory of Atomic Collisions. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 10 (4):671-673.
Andrew Halpin (2011). Conceptual Collisions. Jurisprudence 2 (2):507-519.
Added to index2012-12-09
Total downloads24 ( #155,334 of 1,792,259 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #464,595 of 1,792,259 )
How can I increase my downloads?