David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophical Papers 34 (2):209-233 (2005)
How should we deal with apparent causation involving events that have not happened when omissions are cited as causes or when something is said to prevent some event? Phil Dowe claims that causal statements about preventions and omissions are ‘quasi-causal' claims about what would have been a cause, if the omitted event had happened or been caused if the prevention had not occurred. However, one important theory of the logic of causal statements – Donald Davidson's – allows us to take causal statements about omissions and preventions as direct causal statements about events that are counterfactually described. This analysis provides a basis for solving a number of puzzles about ‘negative' events. Any ‘intuition' of difference between causal statements employing such descriptions and others employing positive descriptions of events is also explained. With omissions, where this intuition has some basis, it is shown that nevertheless omissions do really cause outcomes
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Jonathan Francis Bennett (1995). The Act Itself. Oxford University Press.
Nancy Cartwright (1989). Nature's Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford University Press.
Donald Davidson (1980). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford University Press.
P. Dowe (2001). A Counterfactual Theory of Prevention and 'Causation' by Omission. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (2):216 – 226.
Philippa Foot (1994). More Impertinent Distinctions and a Defense of Active Euthanasia. In Bonnie Steinbock & Alastair Norcross (eds.), Killing and Letting Die. Fordham University Press. 267.
Citations of this work BETA
David Hommen (2014). Moore and Schaffer on the Ontology of Omissions. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (1):71-89.
Similar books and articles
D. Benjamin Barros (2013). Negative Causation in Causal and Mechanistic Explanation. Synthese 190 (3):449-469.
A. David Kline (1980). Are There Cases of Simultaneous Causation? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:292 - 301.
Giovanni Boniolo & Gabriele De Anna (2006). The Four Faces of Omission. Philosophical Explorations 9 (3):277 – 293.
Andrew McGee (2011). Omissions, Causation, and Responsibility. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):351-361.
Stephan Blatti (2006). Disjunctivism. In A. C. Grayling, A. Pyle & N. Goulder (eds.), Continuum Encyclopedia of British Philosophy. Continuum.
Sarah McGrath (2005). Causation by Omission: A Dilemma. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 123 (1-2):125--48.
Francis Longworth (2006). Causation, Pluralism and Responsibility. Philosophica 77.
L. A. Paul (1998). Keeping Track of the Time: Emending the Counterfactual Analysis of Causation. Analysis 58 (3):191–198.
Randolph Clarke (1994). Ability and Responsibility for Omissions. Philosophical Studies 73 (2-3):195 - 208.
Jan Faye, Backward Causation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Matthew Talbert (2012). Praise and Prevention. Philosophical Explorations 15 (1):47-61.
Vinit Haksar (2011). Necessary Evil: Justification, Excuse or Pardon? [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):333-347.
Douglas N. Husak (1980). Omissions, Causation and Liability. Philosophical Quarterly 30 (121):318-326.
William S. Robinson (2005). Zooming in on Downward Causation. Biology and Philosophy 20 (1):117-136.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads19 ( #128,912 of 1,696,590 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,974 of 1,696,590 )
How can I increase my downloads?