Board members in the service industry: An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility orientation and directorial type [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 47 (4):393 - 401 (2003)
|Abstract||One area of business performance of particular interest to both scholars and practitioners is corporate social responsibility. The notion that organizations should be attentive to the needs of constituents other than shareholders has been investigated and vigorously debated for over two decades. This has provoked an especially rich and diverse literature investigating the relationship between business and society. As a result, researchers have urged the study of the profiles and backgrounds of corporate upper echelons in order to better understand this relationship.There is ample evidence that corporations have in recent years increased the proportion of outside directors on their boards. This has been partly in reaction to increased interest in the corporate social responsiveness of business organizations and suggestions that the board of directors could play a unique role in this area. The expectation on the part of practitioners, researchers, and governmental regulators is that outside directors will advocate greater corporate responsiveness to society''s needs by playing a more active role in overseeing managerial decisions.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Coral B. Ingley (2008). Company Growth and Board Attitudes to Corporate Social Responsibility. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (1):17-39.
A. Ibrahim Nabil, P. Howard Donald & P. Angelidis John (forthcoming). The Relationship Between Religiousness and Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation: Are There Differences Between Business Managers and Students? Journal of Business Ethics.
Humphry Hung (2011). Directors' Roles in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Stakeholder Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 103 (3):385-402.
Nabil A. Ibrahim, Donald P. Howard & John P. Angelidis (2008). The Relationship Between Religiousness and Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation: Are There Differences Between Business Managers and Students? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):165 - 174.
Betty S. Coffey & Jia Wang (1998). Board Diversity and Managerial Control as Predictors of Corporate Social Performance. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (14):1595-1603.
Andrew J. Felo (2001). Ethics Programs, Board Involvement, and Potential Conflicts of Interest in Corporate Governance. Journal of Business Ethics 32 (3):205 - 218.
John Angelidis & Nabil Ibrahim (2004). An Exploratory Study of the Impact of Degree of Religiousness Upon an Individual's Corporate Social Responsiveness Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics 51 (2):119-128.
Betty S. Coffey & Gerald E. Fryxell (1991). Institutional Ownership of Stock and Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Empirical Examination. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 10 (6):437 - 444.
Hugh M. O'Neill, Charles B. Saunders & Anne Derwinski McCarthy (1989). Board Members, Corporate Social Responsiveness and Profitability: Are Tradeoffs Necessary? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (5):353 - 357.
Nabil A. Ibrahim & John P. Angelidis (1995). The Corporate Social Responsiveness Orientation of Board Members: Are There Differences Between Inside and Outside Directors? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 14 (5):405 - 410.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #114,394 of 739,303 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,243 of 739,303 )
How can I increase my downloads?