The corporate social responsiveness orientation of board members: Are there differences between inside and outside directors?
Journal of Business Ethics 14 (5):405 - 410 (1995)
| Abstract | Differences and similarities between inside and outside board members with regard to their attitudes toward corporate social responsibility are examined. The results indicate that outside directors exhibit greater concern about the discretionary component of corporate responsibility and a weaker orientation toward economic performance. No significant differences between the two groups were observed with respect to the legal and ethical dimensions of corporate social responsibility. Some explanations as well as limited generalizations and implications are developed. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesA. Ibrahim Nabil, P. Howard Donald & P. Angelidis John (forthcoming). The Relationship Between Religiousness and Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation: Are There Differences Between Business Managers and Students? Journal of Business Ethics.
Morten Huse, Sabina Tacheva Nielsen & Inger Marie Hagen (2009). Women and Employee-Elected Board Members, and Their Contributions to Board Control Tasks. Journal of Business Ethics 89 (4):581 - 597.
Jacob M. Rose (2007). Corporate Directors and Social Responsibility: Ethics Versus Shareholder Value. Journal of Business Ethics 73 (3):319 - 331.
Humphry Hung (2011). Directors' Roles in Corporate Social Responsibility: A Stakeholder Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 103 (3):385-402.
Betty S. Coffey & Gerald E. Fryxell (1991). Institutional Ownership of Stock and Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics 10 (6):437 - 444.
Nabil A. Ibrahim, Donald P. Howard & John P. Angelidis (2008). The Relationship Between Religiousness and Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation: Are There Differences Between Business Managers and Students? Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):165 - 174.
John Angelidis & Nabil Ibrahim (2004). An Exploratory Study of the Impact of Degree of Religiousness Upon an Individual's Corporate Social Responsiveness Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics 51 (2):119-128.
Hugh M. O'Neill, Charles B. Saunders & Anne Derwinski McCarthy (1989). Board Members, Corporate Social Responsiveness and Profitability: Are Tradeoffs Necessary? Journal of Business Ethics 8 (5):353 - 357.
Nabil A. Ibrahim, Donald P. Howard & John P. Angelidis (2003). Board Members in the Service Industry: An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation and Directorial Type. Journal of Business Ethics 47 (4):393 - 401.
Nabil A. Ibrahim, John P. Angelidis & Donald P. Howard (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis of Perceptions of Practicing Accountants and Accounting Students. Journal of Business Ethics 66 (2-3):157 - 167.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads15 ( #78,613 of 549,070 )Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,252 of 549,070 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
