The Relative Importance of Ethics as a Selection Criterion for Entry-Level Public Accountants: Does Gender Make a Difference? [Book Review]
Graduate studies at Western
Journal of Business Ethics 85 (1):49 - 58 (2009)
|Abstract||This paper examines public accountants' perceptions of the relative importance of business ethics as a selection criterion for entry-level public accounting positions. Also, it seeks to determine whether gender differences do exist with respect to these perceptions. The data were collected through a survey of 335 professional accountants in four southeastern states. The results show that, among the eight selection factors that were studied, technical competence in accounting, communication skills, and interpersonal skills were the most influential, while professionalism and leadership abilities were the least important. Ethics was ranked fourth by the females and sixth by the males. A multivariate analysis of variance revealed significant differences between the genders with respect to five of the eight factors. The females' scores were higher for ethics and interpersonal skills and lower for conceptual aptitude, strategic thinking, and leadership abilities. Implications for accounting educators and practitioners are discussed|
|Keywords||selection accounting ethics communication interpersonal skills professionalism strategic thinking conceptual aptitude|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nabil A. Ibrahim, John P. Angelidis & Donald P. Howard (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Comparative Analysis of Perceptions of Practicing Accountants and Accounting Students. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 66 (2-3):157 - 167.
Maria Krambia-Kapardis & Anastasios Zopiatis (2011). Personal Values of Accountants and Accounting Trainees in Cyprus. Business Ethics 20 (1):59-70.
Yves Gendron, Roy Suddaby & Helen Lam (2006). An Examination of the Ethical Commitment of Professional Accountants to Auditor Independence. Journal of Business Ethics 64 (2):169 - 193.
Mohammad J. Abdolmohammadi, William J. Read & D. Paul Scarbrough (2003). Does Selection-Socialization Help to Explain Accountants' Weak Ethical Reasoning? Journal of Business Ethics 42 (1):71 - 81.
Dennis M. Patten (1990). The Differential Perception of Accountants to Maccoby's Head/Heart Traits. Journal of Business Ethics 9 (10):791 - 798.
Robin R. Radtke (2000). The Effects of Gender and Setting on Accountants' Ethically Sensitive Decisions. Journal of Business Ethics 24 (4):299 - 312.
Anamitra Shome & Hema Rao (2009). Machiavellianism in Public Accountants: Some Additional Canadian Evidence. Business Ethics 18 (4):364-371.
Gail Eynon, Nancy Thorley Hills & Kevin T. Stevens (1997). Factors That Influence the Moral Reasoning Abilities of Accountants: Implications for Universities and the Profession. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1297-1309.
James Poon Teng Fatt (1995). Ethics and the Accountant. Journal of Business Ethics 14 (12):997 - 1004.
Jeanne M. David, Jeffrey Kantor & Ira Greenberg (1994). Possible Ethical Issues and Their Impact on the Firm: Perceptions Held by Public Accountants. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (12):919 - 937.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #142,564 of 740,802 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?