Review of Keith DeRose, The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Vol. 1
Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (12) (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,679 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesFederico Luzzi (2011). Contextualism and Counter-Closure. Dialectica 66 (1):187-199.
Keith DeRose (2002). Assertion, Knowledge, and Context. Philosophical Review 111 (2):167-203.
Jennifer Nagel (2012). The Attitude of Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 84 (3):678-685.
Bruce Russell (2005). Contextualism on a Pragmatic, Not a Skeptical, Footing. Acta Analytica 20 (2):26-37.
Sarah Wright (2010). Virtues, Social Roles, and Contextualism. Metaphilosophy 41 (1):95-114.
Keith DeRose (2009). The Case for Contextualism. Oxford University Press.
Keith DeRose (2009). The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Vol. 1. OUP Oxford.
Peter Baumann (2010). The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Vol. I – Keith DeRose. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):424-427.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-12-11Total downloads81 ( #9,485 of 549,084 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,084 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
