In Defence of Virtue Epistemology

Synthese 179 (3):409-33 (2011)
In a number of recent papers Duncan Pritchard argues that virtue epistemology's central ability condition—one knows that p if and only if one has attained cognitive success (true belief) because of the exercise of intellectual ability—is neither necessary nor sufficient for knowledge. This paper discusses and dismisses a number of responses to Pritchard's objections and develops a new way of defending virtue epistemology against them.
Keywords Epistemology  Virtue Epistemology
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 23,201
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

View all 32 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Christoph Kelp (2016). Justified Belief: Knowledge First‐Style. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (3):n/a-n/a.
Guy Rohrbaugh (2015). Inner Achievement. Erkenntnis 80 (6):1191-1204.
Christoph Kelp (2014). Epistemology Extended. Philosophical Issues 24 (1):230-252.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

231 ( #13,408 of 1,940,965 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

28 ( #18,097 of 1,940,965 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.