David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in East European Thought 56 (4):383-403 (2004)
Two topics determine today's liberal tolerant attitude towards Others: the respect of Otherness and the obsessive fear of harassment: the Other is OK insofar as its presence is not intrusive, insofar as the Other is not really Other. The central human right in late-capitalist society, namely the right to be free from all harassment by the Other including the violent imposition of ethical norms, contrasts sharply with the violent imposition of divine Mosaic law – the Decalogue – from which the idea of human rights ultimately derives. The underlying discursive shift can be analyzed with the help of Lacan: the discourse of the Master had been replaced by university discourse. While the Master's decision is per se violent, university discourse is enunciated from the position of neutral Knowledge. The truth of the university discourse is power: the constitutive lie of the university discourse is that it disavows its performative dimension, presenting what effectively amounts to a political decision based on power as a simple insight into the factual state of things.
|Keywords||Agamben biopolitics consumption domination excess-enjoyment Foucault four discourses Lacan love/charity Master-Signifier Nietzsche Racine reduplicatio totalitarianism tolerance University discourse Woody Allen|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ryan Gunderson (2013). Problems with the Defetishization Thesis: Ethical Consumerism, Alternative Food Systems, and Commodity Fetishism. [REVIEW] Agriculture and Human Values:1-9.
Similar books and articles
Elizabeth Purcell (2011). Fetishizing Ontology. Radical Philosophy Review 14 (1):67-84.
Karl-Otto Apel (2001). The Response of Discourse Ethics to the Moral Challenge of the Human Situation as Such and Especially Today. Brad.
Arash Abizadeh (2010). Closed Borders, Human Rights, and Democratic Legitimation. In David Hollenbach (ed.), Driven From Home: Human Rights and the New Realities of Forced Migration. Georgetown University Press.
H. J. Verkuyl & C. F. M. Vermeulen (1996). Shifting Perspectives in Discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 19 (5):503 - 526.
Livia Polanyi, Martin van den Berg & David Ahn (2003). Discourse Structure and Sentential Information Structure. An Initial Proposal. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (3):337-350.
Yannis Stavrakakis (2007). The Lacanian Left: Psychoanalysis, Theory, Politics. State University of New York Press.
Philip Pettit (2003). Discourse Theory and Republican Freedom. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):72-95.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #36,088 of 1,101,562 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #178,496 of 1,101,562 )
How can I increase my downloads?