Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (7):111-125 (2007)
|Abstract||We explore the understanding of conscious states in terms of spatio-temporal dynamics through modelling a mobile agent. Conscious states are associated with an agent's spontaneous and deterministic fluctuation between attachment to and detachment from the surroundings. It is because of this fluctuating nature, we argue, that an agent can perceive structure in the world. Perception requires a conscious state in physical devices. This is a central concern of this paper, and we examine it by simulating a mobile agent equipped with an interconnected Fitz-Hugh-Nagumo (FHN) neuron network with delayed signal transmissions. The agent can move around a space by sensing the environment pattern through the input neurons and computing the motor outputs via the FHN network. The agent shows a variety of motion styles and a spontaneous selection of motion styles responding to the surroundings. Such a phenomenon is named embodied chaotic itinerancy (ECI), as an extension of chaotic itinerant dynamics, which is known to be a typical dynamic with a high degree of freedom. We take this selective mode of response to be significant, particularly those interacting with spatial pattern, as an inevitable property of conscious states.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Susan A. J. Stuart (2002). A Radical Notion of Embeddedness: A Logically Necessary Precondition for Agency and Self-Awareness. Metaphilosophy 33 (1-2):98-109.
George Kampis (2004). Complexity is a Cue to the Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):585-586.
Ichiro Tsuda (2001). The Plausibility of a Chaotic Brain Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):829-840.
Riccardo Manzotti (2006). A Process Oriented View of Conscious Perception. Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (6):7-41.
Rick Grush (1998). Perception, Imagery, and the Sensorimotor Loop. In F. Esken & F.-D. Heckman (eds.), A Consciousness Reader. Schoeningh Verlag.
Donald L. Rowe (2001). Dynamic Neural Activity as Chaotic Itinerancy or Heteroclinic Cycles? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):827-828.
Ichiro Tsuda (2001). Toward an Interpretation of Dynamic Neural Activity in Terms of Chaotic Dynamical Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):793-810.
Leslie M. Kay (2001). Chaotic Itinerancy: Insufficient Perceptual Evidence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):819-820.
Takashi Ikegami & Jun Tani (2001). Chaotic Itinerancy Needs Embodied Cognition to Explain Memory Dynamics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):818-819.
Ichiro Tsuda (2004). Chaotic Itinerancy is a Key to Mental Diversity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):586-587.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads8 ( #123,161 of 549,128 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?