David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (3):427-454 (2004)
Historians have long sought putative connections between different areas of Newton’s scientific work, while recently scholars have argued that there were causal links between even more disparate fields of his intellectual activity. In this paper I take an opposite approach, and attempt to account for certain tensions in Newton’s ‘scientific’ work by examining his great sensitivity to the disciplinary divisions that both conditioned and facilitated his early investigations in science and mathematics. These momentous undertakings, exemplified by research that he wrote up in two separate notebooks, obey strict distinctions between approaches appropriate to both new and old ‘natural philosophy’ and those appropriate to the mixed mathematical sciences. He retained a fairly rigid demarcation between them until the early eighteenth century. At the same time as Newton presented the ‘mathematical principles’ of natural philosophy in his magnum opus of 1687, he remained equally committed to a separate and more private world or ontology that he publicly denigrated as hypothetical or conjectural. This is to say nothing of the worlds implicit in his work on mathematics and alchemy. He did not lurch from one overarching ontological commitment to the next but instead simultaneously—and often radically—developed generically distinct concepts and ontologies that were appropriate to specific settings and locations as well as to relevant styles of argument. Accordingly I argue that the concepts used by Newton throughout his career were intimately bound up with these appropriate generic or quasi-disciplinary ‘structures’. His later efforts to bring together active principles, aethers and voids in various works were not failures that resulted from his ‘confusion’ but were bold attempts to meld together concepts or ontologies that belonged to distinct enquiries. His analysis could not be ‘coherent’ because the structures in which they appeared were fundamentally incompatible.Author Keywords: Connectionism; Incoherence; Appropriateness; Setting; Discipline; Genre; Structure
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Sean Burke (1998). The Death and Return of the Author: Criticism and Subjectivity in Barthes, Foucault and Derrida. Edinburgh University Press.
Yves Gingras (2001). What Did Mathematics Do to Physics? History of Science 39 (4):383-416.
John Henry (1986). Occult Qualities and the Experimental Philosophy: Active Principles in Pre-Newtonian Matter Theory. History of Science 24:335-381.
Matthew L. Jones (2001). Writing and Sentiment: Blaise Pascal, the Vacuum, and the Pensées. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (1):139-181.
Ronald Laymon (1978). Newton's Experimentum Crucis and the Logic of Idealization and Theory Refutation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 9 (1):51-77.
Citations of this work BETA
Steffen Ducheyne (2009). Understanding (in) Newton's Argument for Universal Gravitation. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):227 - 258.
Steffen Ducheyne (2011). Mathematical and Philosophical Newton. Metascience 20 (3):467-476.
Similar books and articles
Andre Kukla (1995). Is There a Logic of Incoherence? International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 9 (1):59 – 71.
Friederike Moltmann (2013). Abstract Objects and the Semantics of Natural Language. Oxford University Press.
Mary Domski (2010). Newton's Empiricism and Metaphysics. Philosophy Compass 5 (7):525-534.
Sven Ove Hansson (2008). Philosophy and Other Disciplines. Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):472-483.
Andrew Janiak (2008). Newton as Philosopher. Cambridge University Press.
Isaac Newton (2004). Philosophical Writings. Cambridge, Uk ;Cambridge University Press.
Isaac Newton (1953/2005). Newton's Philosophy of Nature: Selections From His Writings. Dover Publications.
Steffen Ducheyne, The General Scholium: Some Notes on Newton's Published and Unpublished Endeavours.
Re'em Segev (2008). Weighing Values and Balancing Interests. Israel Democracy Institute.
Chris Daly & David Liggins (2011). Deferentialism. Philosophical Studies 156 (3):321-337.
Eric Schliesser (2011). Newton's Challenge to Philosophy: A Programmatic Essay. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (1):101-128.
J. E. McGuire (1983). Certain Philosophical Questions: Newton's Trinity Notebook. Cambridge University Press.
Eric Schliesser (2009). Hume’s Attack on Newton’s Philosophy. Enlightenment and Dissent 25:167-203.
Quayshawn Spencer (2004). Do Newton's Rules of Reasoning Guarantee Truth ... Must They? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35 (4):759-782.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads2 ( #499,576 of 1,696,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #342,645 of 1,696,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?