David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ontos Verlag (2008)
Since the rise of modern thought and natural science, teleological discourses have been banished as explanatory tools in natural investigations. The various contributions to this volume embrace the task of rethinking natural purposiveness in accordance with natural science. They set out from the issue of whether, and in which form, it is possible to talk of purposes in nature, without resorting to an account requesting some intentional agent. The legitimacy of such a notion as that of internal teleology has been addressed, together with the issue of what the term "internal" properly denotes. It is meant to be an alternative both to the position of those who assume that teleology in biology requires a dimension transcending nature itself and find in teleological language an argument for the Intelligent Designer, and to the stance of those who aim to eliminate teleology from scientific inquiry altogether. (publisher)
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Buy the book||$37.95 direct from Amazon (6% off) $63.04 used $76.34 new Amazon page|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Luca Illetterati (2008). Being-For: Purposes and Functions in Artefacts and Living Beings. In Purposiveness: Teleology Between Nature and Mind. Ontos Verlag
Attila Grandpierre (2012). A Biological Account of Design in Nature. In Swan Liz, Gordon Richard & Seckbach Joseph (eds.), Origin of Design in Nature.
Mariska Leunissen (2010). Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle's Science of Nature. Cambridge University Press.
F. J. K. Soontiëns (1991). Evolution: Teleology or Chance? [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (1):133-141.
Bradford McCall (2011). Purpose in the Living World? Creation and Emergent Evolution. By Jacob Klapwijk and Purposiveness: Teleology Between Nature and Mind. Edited by Luca Illetterati and Francesca Michelini. Heythrop Journal 52 (2):321-322.
Andre Ariew (2007). Teleology. In David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge University Press
Jeffrey K. McDonough (2009). Leibniz on Natural Teleology and the Laws of Optics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (3):505 - 544.
Marcel Quarfood (2006). Kant on Biological Teleology: Towards a Two-Level Interpretation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 37 (4):735-747.
Mariska Elisabeth Maria Philomena Johannes Leunissen, Explanation and Teleology in Aristotle's Philosophy of Nature.
Hannah Ginsborg (2006). Kant's Biological Teleology and Its Philosophical Significance. In A Companion to Kant. Blackwell Publishing
Arthur E. Falk (1981). Purpose, Feedback, and Evolution. Philosophy of Science 48 (2):198-217.
Willem A. deVries (1991). The Dialectic of Teleology. Philosophical Topics 19 (2):51-70.
D. M. Walsh (2006). Organisms as Natural Purposes: The Contemporary Evolutionary Perspective. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 37 (4):771-791.
Frederick S. Carney (1978). On McCormick and Teleological Morality. Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (1):81 - 107.
Clark Zumbach (1981). Kant's Argument for the Autonomy of Biology. Nature and System 3:67 - 79.
Added to index2011-05-26
Total downloads16 ( #281,218 of 1,932,585 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #272,096 of 1,932,585 )
How can I increase my downloads?