Look who's talking: The interdisciplinarity of bioethics and the implications for bioethics education
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):629 – 641 (2006)
There are competing accounts of the birth of bioethics. Despite the differences among them, these accounts share the claim that bioethics was not born in a single disciplinary home or in a single social space, but in numerous, including hospitals, doctors' offices, research laboratories, courtrooms, medical schools, churches and synagogues, and philosophy classrooms. This essay considers the interdisciplinarity of bioethics and the contribution of new disciplines to bioethics. It also explores the implications of interdisciplinarity for bioethics education. As bioethics develops, it will be helpful to identify essential elements in the education of bioethicists and to distinguish between members of other disciplines who make important contributions to bioethics and bioethicists.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
John Gregory, William Strahan & T. Cadell (1772). Lectures on the Duties and Qualifications of a Physician. Printed for W. Strahan; and T. Cadell, in the Strand.
Albert R. Jonsen (2003). The Birth of Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Loretta M. Kopelman (2006). Bioethics as a Second-Order Discipline: Who is Not a Bioethicist? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):601 – 628.
M. L. Tina Stevens (2001). [Book Review] Bioethics in America, Origins and Cultural Politics. [REVIEW] Hastings Center Report 31 (5):40-45.
Robert M. Veatch (2005). Disrupted Dialogue: Medical Ethics and the Collapse of Physician-Humanist Communication (1770-1980). Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Shaikh Mohd Saifuddeen, Noor Naemah Abdul Rahman, Noor Munirah Isa & Azizan Baharuddin (2014). Maqasid Al-Shariah as a Complementary Framework to Conventional Bioethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):317-327.
Rebecca L. Volpe & Erica Rangel Salter (2011). Too Quick to Judge. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (04):612-614.
Similar books and articles
Leigh Turner (2009). Anthropological and Sociological Critiques of Bioethics. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (1):83-98.
Richard Twine (2007). Thinking Across Species—a Critical Bioethics Approach to Enhancement. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (6):509-523.
Darleen Douglas-Steele & Edward M. Hundert (1996). Accounting for Context: Future Directions in Bioethics Theory and Research. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 17 (2).
Catherine Myser (ed.) (2011). Bioethics Around the Globe. Oxford University Press.
Søren Holm & Bryn Williams-Jones (2006). Global Bioethics – Myth or Reality? BMC Medical Ethics 7 (1):1-10.
Maurice A. M. de Wachter (1982). Interdisciplinary Bioethics: But Where Do We Start?: A Reflection on Epochè as Method. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 7 (3):275-288.
Daniel Sperling (2008). Law and Bioethics : A Rights-Based Relationship and its Troubling Implications. In Michael D. A. Freeman (ed.), Law and Bioethics / Edited by Michael Freeman. Oxford University Press
Nathan Emmerich (2011). Literature, History and the Humanization of Bioethics. Bioethics 25 (2):112-118.
Renée C. Fox (2008). Observing Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads20 ( #130,548 of 1,699,835 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #269,935 of 1,699,835 )
How can I increase my downloads?