David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):526-552 (2010)
Within and among societies, there are competing understandings of the status of children, including debates over whether they can bear rights and, if so, which rights they bear and against whom, and their capacity to make decisions and be held responsible and accountable for actions. There also are different understandings of what constitutes a family; what authority parents have over and regarding their children; and what should happen to children who are without parents because of death, desertion, or imprisonment. These and other related debates reflect deep differences in worldviews, in how one understands the legitimate role of the state, in how one comes to know the proper way to raise children, and so on. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child purports to reflect international convergence on the rights of children, on how decisions concerning children should be made, and on how children ought to be treated by the state and by their parents. This paper examines whether the Convention's framework for decision making concerning children is an appropriate framework for pediatric bioethics. Questions about how to make health care decisions for children ultimately are questions of who is in authority to make and judge such decisions. Establishing who is in authority, determining whether there are any limits to that authority and, if so, defining those limits should be the focus of efforts to develop and implement a pediatric decision-making framework
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Douglas Diekema (2004). Parental Refusals of Medical Treatment: The Harm Principle as Threshold for State Intervention. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4):243-264.
L. M. Kopelman (1997). The Best-Interests Standard as Threshold, Ideal, and Standard of Reasonableness. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (3):271-289.
Ruiping Fan & Julia Tao (2004). Consent to Medical Treatment: The Complex Interplay of Patients, Families, and Physicians. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (2):139 – 148.
Rosalind Ekman Ladd (2004). The Child as Living Donor: Parental Consent and Child Assent. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (2):143-148.
Insoo Hyun (2000). When Adolescents "Mismanage" Their Chronic Medical Conditions: An Ethical Exploration. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (2):147-163.
Citations of this work BETA
B. C. Partridge (2013). The Mature Minor: Some Critical Psychological Reflections on the Empirical Bases. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (3):283-299.
Mark J. Cherry (2015). Re-Thinking the Role of the Family in Medical Decision-Making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (4):451-472.
M. J. Cherry (2011). Familial Authority and Christian Bioethics--A Geography of Moral and Social Controversies. Christian Bioethics 17 (3):185-205.
M. Wang, P. -C. Lo & R. Fan (2010). Medical Decision Making and the Family: An Examination of Controversies. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):493-498.
Similar books and articles
M. J. Cherry (2010). Parental Authority and Pediatric Bioethical Decision Making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):553-572.
B. C. Partridge (2010). Adolescent Psychological Development, Parenting Styles, and Pediatric Decision Making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):518-525.
Farah Focquaert (2013). Deep Brain Stimulation in Children: Parental Authority Versus Shared Decision-Making. Neuroethics 6 (3):447-455.
Michael Gill, Picu Prometheus: Ethical Issues in the Treatment of Very Sick Children in Paediatric Intensive Care.
Victoria A. Miller, William W. Reynolds & Robert M. Nelson (2008). Parent-Child Roles in Decision Making About Medical Research. Ethics and Behavior 18 (2 & 3):161 – 181.
H. T. Engelhardt (2010). Beyond the Best Interests of Children: Four Views of the Family and of Foundational Disagreements Regarding Pediatric Decision Making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):499-517.
Ferdinand Schoeman (1985). Parental Discretion and Children's Rights: Background and Implications for Medical Decision-Making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):45-62.
Kimberly Strong, Ian Kerridge & Miles Little (2014). Savior Siblings, Parenting and the Moral Valorization of Children. Bioethics 28 (4):187-193.
Jessica Masty & Celia Fisher (2008). A Goodness-of-Fit Approach to Informed Consent for Pediatric Intervention Research. Ethics and Behavior 18 (2 & 3):139 – 160.
H. U. I. Edwin (2011). Adolescent and Parental Perceptions of Medical Decision-Making in Hong Kong. Bioethics 25 (9):516-526.
Hugh LaFollette (1998). Circumscribed Autonomy: Children, Care, and Custody. In Uma Narayan & Julia Bartkowiak (eds.), Having and Raising Children. Penn State University Press
M. Woods (2001). Balancing Rights and Duties in 'Life and Death' Decision Making Involving Children: A Role for Nurses? Nursing Ethics 8 (5):397-408.
Added to index2010-09-06
Total downloads19 ( #190,190 of 1,793,278 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,804 of 1,793,278 )
How can I increase my downloads?