Between the horns: A dilemma in the interpretation of the running of the bulls - part 1: The confrontation
Graduate studies at Western
Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (3):325 – 345 (2007)
|Abstract||The essay, divided in two parts, examines the event of the running of the bulls (encierro in Spanish). The phenomenon of the encierro, a complex cultural activity of deep historical roots, demands to be understood: What drives people to risk injury or death at the horns of untamed bulls? How should we make sense of this, subjective and objectively? To answer these questions, I use a framework that relies on explanation and assessment of popular views on the way to arguing for a philosophical alternative. This arrangement is readily adaptable to many other sporting (and non-sporting) activities where risk and/or mass participation are key factors. Its unorthodox format ? organised around an opening narrative of a paradigmatic, skilled and lucky run with the bulls, as well as hors texte (direct appeals to the reader) ? brings the reader straight into the fray, philosophical and otherwise. Part I begins by presenting the history of the encierro. It also explains the dynamics of the event, often via images with pedagogical and critical side-commentaries. It proceeds to introduce and critically engage with prevalent explanations, most with ethnological tendencies, that conceive the running as tradition, rite, ritual and sport. This part ends with a dilemma whereby we either try to explain matters by resorting to particular and partial interpretations, or a ?democratic? conglomerate of superficial and confusing boundaries, or in the end we simply concede our inability to understand the phenomenon of the running of the bulls in toto. This philosophical impasse will be evaded in part 2 (Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 2, 1) via existentialist and phenomenological analysis|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
William F. Vallicella (2002). The Creation–Conservation Dilemma and Presentist Four-Dimensionalism. Religious Studies 38 (2):187-200.
Dale Dorsey (2011). The Hedonist's Dilemma. Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (2):173-196.
Kristin Mickelson (2010). The Soft-Line Solution to Pereboom's Four-Case Argument. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):595-617.
Ian R. Holzman (1999). The Horns of the Dilemma Are Sharp. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (04):480-484.
Rosemary Desjardins (1981). The Horns of Dilemma. Ancient Philosophy 1 (2):109-126.
Ishtiyaque Haji (2006). The Principle of Alternate Possibilities and a Defeated Dilemma. Philosophical Explorations 9 (2):179 – 201.
Ross Cameron (2010). On the Source of Necessity. In Bob Hale & Aviv Hoffman (eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic and Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
Jes (2007). Between the Horns: A Dilemma in the Interpretation of the Running of the Bulls - Part 1: The Confrontation. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (3):325 – 345.
Jesus Ilundain-Agurruza (2008). Between the Horns: A Dilemma in the Interpretation of the Running of the Bulls-Part 2: The Evasion. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 2 (1):18 – 38.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #62,772 of 739,404 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,680 of 739,404 )
How can I increase my downloads?