Bringing bodies back in: for a phenomenological and psychoanalytic film criticism of embodied cultural identity
| Abstract | This article reassesses the concept of identification in line with the increased importance phenomenology has taken on in film-philosophy of the 1990s and 2000s. In the 1970s and 1980s, a Lacanian psychoanalytic interpretation of identification dominated film theory and criticism, and spectatorial engagement with elements of films was understood as what psychoanalysis calls secondary identification – the identification with stable subject-positions (characters) in the film-text. But non-Lacanian psychoanalysis and Merleau-Ponty’s existential phenomenology offer film-philosophy a very different understanding of identification as a non image-based, ‘blind’, bodily affective tie that is established between spectators and what Vivian Sobchack describes as ‘the sense and sensibility of materiality itself’ (Sobchack 2004, 65). By first exploring how this more bodily (for psychoanalysis, primary) identification is theorized by psychoanalysts (Freud, Paul Schilder, Henri Wallon) and by film theorists (Kaja Silverman), the article proposes that film criticism make greater use of it in order to engage more meaningfully with the visible cultural specificities – size, skin colour, age, sex – of the images of bodies viewed on cinema screens. It is not just ‘the’ body that needs bringing back into thinking about film spectatorship, but culturally differentiated bodies, both on the screen and in the auditorium. A psychoanalytic and phenomenological film criticism of embodied cultural identity, one that attends to the materiality of the film and of the body-images and objects on the screen, may be the most culturally and politically useful successor to ‘screen’ theory of the 1970s and 1980s | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,705 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. Try with proxy. Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Only published papers are available at libraries |
Similar books and articlesLaurie Shrage (1990). Feminist Film Aesthetics: A Contextual Approach. Hypatia 5 (2):137 - 148.
Gregory Currie (1995). Image and Mind: Film, Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Cambridge University Press.
Elspeth Kydd (2011). The Critical Practice of Film: An Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
David E. W. Fenner (2001). Virtues and Vices in Film Criticism. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (2):309-322.
Andrew Kania (2002). The Illusion of Realism in Film. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (3):243-258.
Dudley Andrew (1984). Concepts in Film Theory. Oxford University Press.
Christine Etherington-Wright (2011). Understanding Film Theory: Theoretical and Critical Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
Allan Casebier (1991). Film and Phenomenology: Toward a Realist Theory of Cinematic Representation. Cambridge University Press.
Francesco Casetti (1999). Theories of Cinema, 1945-1995. University of Texas Press.
Shawn Loht (2013). Film as Heideggerian Art? A Reassessment of Heidegger, Film, and His Connection to Terrence Malick. Film and Philosophy 17:113-36.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2011-08-18Total downloads1 ( #274,982 of 549,372 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,372 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
