Bringing Bodies Back In: For a Phenomenological and Psychoanalytic Film Criticism of Embodied Cultural Identity
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Film-Philosophy 15 (1):1-12 (2011)
This article reassesses the concept of identification in line with the increased importance phenomenology has taken on in film-philosophy of the 1990s and 2000s. In the 1970s and 1980s, a Lacanian psychoanalytic interpretation of identification dominated film theory and criticism, and spectatorial engagement with elements of films was understood as what psychoanalysis calls secondary identification – the identification with stable subject-positions (characters) in the film-text. But non-Lacanian psychoanalysis and Merleau-Ponty’s existential phenomenology offer film-philosophy a very different understanding of identification as a non image-based, ‘blind’, bodily affective tie that is established between spectators and what Vivian Sobchack describes as ‘the sense and sensibility of materiality itself’ (Sobchack 2004, 65). By first exploring how this more bodily (for psychoanalysis, primary ) identification is theorized by psychoanalysts (Freud, Paul Schilder, Henri Wallon) and by film theorists (Kaja Silverman), the article proposes that film criticism make greater use of it in order to engage more meaningfully with the visible cultural specificities – size, skin colour, age, sex – of the images of bodies viewed on cinema screens. It is not just ‘the’ body that needs bringing back into thinking about film spectatorship, but culturally differentiated bodies , both on the screen and in the auditorium. A psychoanalytic and phenomenological film criticism of embodied cultural identity, one that attends to the materiality of the film and of the body-images and objects on the screen, may be the most culturally and politically useful successor to ‘screen’ theory of the 1970s and 1980s
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Laurie Shrage (1990). Feminist Film Aesthetics: A Contextual Approach. Hypatia 5 (2):137 - 148.
Gregory Currie (1995). Image and Mind: Film, Philosophy and Cognitive Science. Cambridge University Press.
Elspeth Kydd (2011). The Critical Practice of Film: An Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
David E. W. Fenner (2001). Virtues and Vices in Film Criticism. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (2):309-322.
Andrew Kania (2002). The Illusion of Realism in Film. British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (3):243-258.
Dudley Andrew (1984). Concepts in Film Theory. Oxford University Press.
Christine Etherington-Wright (2011). Understanding Film Theory: Theoretical and Critical Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
Allan Casebier (1991). Film and Phenomenology: Toward a Realist Theory of Cinematic Representation. Cambridge University Press.
Francesco Casetti (1999). Theories of Cinema, 1945-1995. University of Texas Press.
Shawn Loht (2013). Film as Heideggerian Art? A Reassessment of Heidegger, Film, and His Connection to Terrence Malick. Film and Philosophy 17:113-36.
Gaston Roberge (1992). The Ways of Film Studies: Film Theory & the Interpretation of Films. Ajanta Publications.
Added to index2011-08-18
Total downloads28 ( #139,234 of 1,796,170 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #42,197 of 1,796,170 )
How can I increase my downloads?