Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Studies 159 (1):69-87 (2012)
|Abstract||According to the iterative conception of set, sets can be arranged in a cumulative hierarchy divided into levels. But why should we think this to be the case? The standard answer in the philosophical literature is that sets are somehow constituted by their members. In the first part of the paper, I present a number of problems for this answer, paying special attention to the view that sets are metaphysically dependent upon their members. In the second part of the paper, I outline a different approach, which circumvents these problems by dispensing with the priority or dependence relation altogether. Along the way, I show how this approach enables the mathematical structuralist to defuse an objection recently raised against her view.|
|Keywords||Iterative conception Minimalism Metaphysical dependence|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thomas Forster (2008). The Iterative Conception of Set. Review of Symbolic Logic 1 (1):97-110.
Christopher Menzel (1986). On the Iterative Explanation of the Paradoxes. Philosophical Studies 49 (1):37 - 61.
Christopher Menzel (forthcoming). Wide Sets, ZFCU, and the Iterative Conception. Journal of Philosophy.
J. P. Studd (2012). The Iterative Conception of Set: A (Bi-)Modal Axiomatisation. Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (5):1-29.
Mark F. Sharlow (1987). Proper Classes Via the Iterative Conception of Set. Journal of Symbolic Logic 52 (3):636-650.
Eric Steinhart (2002). Logically Possible Machines. Minds and Machines 12 (2):259-280.
Stefano Caputo (forthcoming). The Dependence of Truth on Being: Is There a Problem for Minimalism? In Miguel Hoeltje, Benjamin Schnieder & Alex Steinberg (eds.), Ontological Dependence, Supervenience, and Response-Dependence. Basic Philosophical Concepts Series,. Philosophia Verlag.
Siegfried Gottwald (2006). Universes of Fuzzy Sets and Axiomatizations of Fuzzy Set Theory. Part I: Model-Based and Axiomatic Approaches. [REVIEW] Studia Logica 82 (2):211 - 244.
John P. Burgess (1988). Sets and Point-Sets: Five Grades of Set-Theoretic Involvement in Geometry. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:456 - 463.
Siegfried Gottwald (2006). Universes of Fuzzy Sets and Axiomatizations of Fuzzy Set Theory. Part II: Category Theoretic Approaches. Studia Logica 84 (1):23 - 50.
Juha Kontinen & Jouko Väänänen (2009). On Definability in Dependence Logic. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 18 (3):317-332.
Gabriel Uzquiano (2002). Categoricity Theorems and Conceptions of Set. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (2):181-196.
Michael Glanzberg (2003). Minimalism and Paradoxes. Synthese 135 (1):13 - 36.
Øystein Linnebo (2008). Structuralism and the Notion of Dependence. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (230):59-79.
Luca Incurvati (forthcoming). The Graph Conception of Set. Journal of Philosophical Logic:1-28.
Added to index2011-02-13
Total downloads95 ( #8,728 of 739,354 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,616 of 739,354 )
How can I increase my downloads?