David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Utilitas 9 (03):319- (1997)
Fred Feldman has argued that consequentialists can answer the well-known by replacing the utilitarian axiology with one that makes the value of receiving pleasures and pains depend on how deserved it is. It is shown that this proposal is open to three interpretations: (1) the Fit-idea, which operates with the degree of fit between what recipients get and what they deserve; (2) the Merit-idea, which operates with the magnitude of the recipients' desert or merit; and (3) the Fit-Merit idea which is a combination of (1) and (2). It is argued that none of these ideas will do, among other things because they fail to take into account the fact that justice involves inter-personal comparisons
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Gustaf Arrhenius (2003). Feldman's Desert-Adjusted Utilitarianism and Population Ethics. Utilitas 15 (02):225-.
S. Smilansky (1996). Discussion. The Connection Between Responsibility and Desert: The Crucial Distinction. Mind 105 (419):485-486.
Saul Smilansky (1996). The Connection Between Responsibility and Desert: The Crucial Distinction. Mind 105 (419):485-486.
Matthew Rendall (2013). Priority and Desert. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (5):939-951.
Peter Celello (2009). Against Desert as a Forward-Looking Concept. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (2):144-159.
Bradford Skow (2012). How to Adjust Utility for Desert. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (2):235-257.
Fred Feldman (1997). Utilitarianism, Hedonism, and Desert: Essays in Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
Shelly Kagan (2012). The Geometry of Desert. Oxford University Press.
F. Feldman (1996). Responsibility as a Condition for Desert. Mind 105 (417):165 - 168.
Fred Feldman (1996). Responsibility as a Condition for Desert. Mind 105 (417):165-168.
Fred Feldman (1995). Desert: Reconsideration of Some Received Wisdom. Mind 104 (413):63-77.
Fred Feldman (1995). Justice, Desert, and the Repugnant Conclusion. Utilitas 7 (02):189-206.
Serena Olsaretti (ed.) (2003). Desert and Justice. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads14 ( #162,606 of 1,696,514 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #183,308 of 1,696,514 )
How can I increase my downloads?