David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3 (3):295-302 (2000)
One problematic aspect of the rationality of medical practice concerns the relation between expert knowledge and non-expert knowledge. In medical practice it is important to match medical knowledge with the self-knowledge of the individual patient. This paper tries to study the problem of such matching by describing a model for technological paradigms and comparing it with an ideal of technological rationality. The professionalised experts tend to base their decisions and actions mostly on medical knowledge while the rationality of medicine also involves just as important elements of the personal evaluation and knowledge of the patients. Since both types of knowledge are necessary for rational decisions, the gap between the expert and the non-expert has to be bridged in some way. A solution to the problem is suggested in terms of pluralism, with the patient as ultimate decision-maker.
|Keywords||competence decision medical practice professionalism rationality technological paradigm usefulness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Monika Clark-Grill (2007). Questionable Gate-Keeping: Scientific Evidence for Complementary and Alternative Medicines (CAM): Response to Malcolm Parker. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (1):21-28.
Diana Lin Awad Scrocco (2014). Learning to Argue Like an Expert: The Role Oftopoiin Internal Medicine Residency. Journal of Argumentation in Context 3 (3):231-258.
Similar books and articles
Peter Hucklenbroich (1988). Problems of Nomenclature and Classification in Medical Expert Systems. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 9 (2).
Anja Oskamp (1992). Model for Knowledge and Legal Expert Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (4):245-274.
Omar E. M. Khalil (1993). Artificial Decision-Making and Artificial Ethics: A Management Concern. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4):313 - 321.
Geert Munnichs (2004). Whom to Trust? Public Concerns, Late Modern Risks, and Expert Trustworthiness. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):113-130.
Paul E. Johnson (1983). What Kind of Expert Should a System Be? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (1):77-97.
Claudia Wiesemann (1998). The Significance of Prognosis for a Theory of Medical Practice. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19 (3):253-261.
Moti Mizrahi (2013). Why Arguments From Expert Opinion Are Weak Arguments. Informal Logic 33 (1):57-79.
Michael Cholbi (2007). Moral Expertise and the Credentials Problem. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10 (4):323-334.
Christine W. Chan (2003). Cognitive Modeling and Representation of Knowledge in Ontological Engineering. Brain and Mind 4 (2):269-282.
Jonathan Sinclair Carey (1987). Empathy and the Expert Witness. Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics 8 (1):19-25.
Lotte Asveld (2006). Informed Consent in the Fields of Medical Technological Practice. Techne 10 (1):16-29.
Added to index2010-08-31
Total downloads19 ( #203,447 of 1,911,680 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #322,162 of 1,911,680 )
How can I increase my downloads?