Law and Philosophy 26 (6):575 - 587 (2007)
|Abstract||According to a renowned left-libertarian, Michael Otsuka, a libertarian right of self-ownership can be so robust that one need not sacrifice the use of one's mind and body to help others. In this article, I demonstrate that Otsuka's way of reconciling this robust conception of self-ownership with equality is not appealing and, at best, would provide limited guidance in the face of real-life uncertainty|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jari Niemi (2010). Do Arguments Against Self-Ownership Imply Anything Regarding the Equalisandum Debate? Social Philosophy Today 26:67-81.
Michael Pendlebury, Peter Hudson & Darrel Moellendorf (2001). Capitalist Exploitation, Self-Ownership, and Equality. Philosophical Forum 32 (3):207–220.
Justin Weinberg (1997). Freedom, Self‐Ownership, and Libertarian Philosophical Diaspora. Critical Review 11 (3):323-344.
Edward Feser (2005). Personal Identity and Self-Ownership. Social Philosophy and Policy 22 (2):100-125.
Mathias Risse (2004). Does Left-Libertarianism Have Coherent Foundations? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (3):337-364.
George G. Brenkert (1998). Self-Ownership, Freedom, and Autonomy. Journal of Ethics 2 (1):27-55.
Richard J. Arneson (2010). Self-Ownership and World Ownership: Against Left-Libertarianism. Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (1):168-194.
Michael Otsuka (2005). Libertarianism Without Inequality. Oxford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads17 ( #78,020 of 722,783 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,783 )
How can I increase my downloads?