Disclosive ethics and information technology: Disclosing facial recognition systems
Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2) (2005)
| Abstract | This paper is an attempt to present disclosive ethics as a framework for computer and information ethics – in line with the suggestions by Brey, but also in quite a different manner. The potential of such an approach is demonstrated through a disclosive analysis of facial recognition systems. The paper argues that the politics of information technology is a particularly powerful politics since information technology is an opaque technology – i.e. relatively closed to scrutiny. It presents the design of technology as a process of closure in which design and use decisions become black-boxed and progressively enclosed in increasingly complex socio-technical networks. It further argues for a disclosive ethics that aims to disclose the nondisclosure of politics by claiming a place for ethics in every actual operation of power – as manifested in actual design and use decisions and practices. It also proposes that disclosive ethics would aim to trace and disclose the intentional and emerging enclosure of politics from the very minute technical detail through to social practices and complex social-technical networks. The paper then proceeds to do a disclosive analysis of facial recognition systems. This analysis discloses that seemingly trivial biases in recognition rates of FRSs can emerge as very significant political acts when these systems become used in practice. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
  Try with proxy. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesGeorge Rzevski & Kumkum Prasad (1998). The Synergy of Learning Organisations and Flexible Information Technology. AI and Society 12 (1-2):87-96.
Utpal Bose (2012). An Ethical Framework in Information Systems Decision Making Using Normative Theories of Business Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 14 (1):17-26.
Jürgen Friedrich (1996). Design Science 97. AI and Society 10 (2):199-217.
Orlin Vakarelov (2012). The Information Medium. Philosophy and Technology 25 (1):47-65.
David Strong (1994). Disclosive Discourse, Ecology, and Technology. Environmental Ethics 16 (1):89-102.
Toni Robertson (2006). Ethical Issues in Interaction Design. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (2).
Mathieu Cornelis, Nathalie Grandjean & Claire Lobet (2008). To Be or Not To Be a Behaviorist? Facial Recognition Systems and Critical Knowledge. Tenth IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia, 2008. ISM 2008.:597-601.
Philip Brey (2000). Method in Computer Ethics: Towards a Multi-Level Interdisciplinary Approach. Ethics and Information Technology 2 (2):125-129.
Martin Brigham & Lucas D. Introna (2007). Invoking Politics and Ethics in the Design of Information Technology: Undesigning the Design. Ethics and Information Technology 9 (1).
Lucas D. Introna (2007). Maintaining the Reversibility of Foldings: Making the Ethics (Politics) of Information Technology Visible. Ethics and Information Technology 9 (1).
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads8 ( #124,537 of 556,837 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
