Maintaining the reversibility of foldings: Making the ethics (politics) of information technology visible [Book Review]
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Ethics and Information Technology 9 (1):11-25 (2007)
This paper will address the question of the morality of technology. I believe this is an important question for our contemporary society in which technology, especially information technology, is increasingly becoming the default mode of social ordering. I want to suggest that the conventional manner of conceptualising the morality of technology is inadequate – even dangerous. The conventional view of technology is that technology represents technical means to achieve social ends. Thus, the moral problem of technology, from this perspective, is the way in which the given technical means are applied to particular (good or bad) social ends. In opposition to this I want to suggest that the assumed separation, of this approach, between technical means and social ends are inappropriate. It only serves to hide the most important political and ethical dimensions of technology. I want to suggest that the morality of technology is much more embedded and implicit than such a view would suggest. In order to critique this approach I will draw on phenomenology and the more recent work of Bruno Latour. With these intellectual resources in mind I will propose disclosive ethics as a way to make the morality of technology visible. I will give a brief account of this approach and show how it might guide our␣understanding of the ethics and politics of technology by considering two examples of contemporary information technology: search engines and plagiarism detection systems.
|Keywords||disclosive ethics design Heidegger politics Latour technology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Eleni Kosta, Olli Pitkänen, Marketta Niemelä & Eija Kaasinen (2010). Mobile-Centric Ambient Intelligence in Health- and Homecare—Anticipating Ethical and Legal Challenges. Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):303-323.
Rolland Munro (2010). Not for Turning? Power, Institutional Ethos and the Ethics of Irreversibility. Business Ethics 19 (3):292-307.
Jill McTavish, Roma Harris & Nadine Wathen (2011). Searching for Health: The Topography of the First Page. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 13 (3):227-240.
Similar books and articles
Michael D. Myers & Leigh Miller (1996). Ethical Dilemmas in the Use of Information Technology: An Aristotelian Perspective. Ethics and Behavior 6 (2):153 – 160.
Carl Mitcham & Alois Huning (eds.) (1985). Philosophy and Technology II: Information Technology and Computers in Theory and Practice. Reidel.
Clive Lawson (2008). An Ontology of Technology. Techné 12 (1):48-64.
Kirsten E. Martin & R. Edward Freeman (2004). The Separation of Technology and Ethics in Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 53 (4):353-364.
Babak Sohrabi, Aryan Gholipour & Neda Mohammadesmaeili (2011). Effects of Personality and Information Technology on Plagiarism: An Iranian Perspective. Ethics and Behavior 21 (5):367 - 379.
Marc de Vries (2005). Teaching About Technology: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Technology for Non-Philosophers. Springer.
Toni Robertson (2006). Ethical Issues in Interaction Design. Ethics and Information Technology 8 (2):49-59.
Martin Brigham & Lucas D. Introna (2007). Invoking Politics and Ethics in the Design of Information Technology: Undesigning the Design. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 9 (1):1-10.
Lucas D. Introna (2005). Disclosive Ethics and Information Technology: Disclosing Facial Recognition Systems. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 7 (2):75-86.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #56,514 of 1,088,379 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #69,601 of 1,088,379 )
How can I increase my downloads?