David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Human Studies 29 (1):57 - 76 (2006)
This paper presents a Heideggerian phenomenological analysis of screens. In a world and an epoch where screens pervade a great many aspects of human experience, we submit that phenomenology, much in a traditional methodological form, can provide an interesting and novel basis for our understanding of screens. We ground our analysis in the ontology of Martin Heidegger's Being and Time [1927/1962], claiming that screens will only show themselves as they are if taken as screens-in-the-world. Thus, the phenomenon of screen is not investigated in its empirical form or conceptually. It is rather taken as a grounding intentional orientation that conditions our engagement with certain surfaces as we comport ourselves towards them “as screens.” In doing this we claim to have opened up the phenomenon of screen in a new and meaningful way.
|Keywords||communication computer Heidegger information systems information technology media phenomenology screens television|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Edmund Husserl & Dorion Cairns (1988). Cartesian Meditations an Introduction to Phenomenology. Kluwer Academic.
Don Ihde (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Indiana University Press.
Don Ihde (2001). Bodies in Technology. Univ of Minnesota Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Lucas D. Introna (2007). Maintaining the Reversibility of Foldings: Making the Ethics (Politics) of Information Technology Visible. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 9 (1):11-25.
Joris Vlieghe (2016). A Material and Practical Account of Education in Digital Times: Neil Postman’s Views on Literacy and the Screen Revisited. Studies in Philosophy and Education 35 (2):163-179.
Similar books and articles
Jacquelyn E. Humphrey & Darren D. Lee (2011). Australian Socially Responsible Funds: Performance, Risk and Screening Intensity. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 102 (4):519-535.
Kirsty Best (2004). Interfacing the Environment: Networked Screens and the Ethics of Visual Consumption. Ethics and the Environment 9 (2):65-85.
Mark S. Schwartz (2003). The "Ethics" of Ethical Investing. Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):195 - 213.
Wolfgang W. Fuchs (2010). Remote Control. Environment, Space, Place 2 (1):9-16.
Barbara Krumsiek (2003). Socially Responsible High Tech Companies: Emerging Issues. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 43 (3):179 - 187.
Mark Jonathan Rhodes (2010). Information Asymmetry and Socially Responsible Investment. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (1):145 - 151.
Kenneth Burke (1965). Terministic Screens. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 39:87-102.
Paul Stob (2008). "Terministic Screens," Social Constructionism, and the Language of Experience: Kenneth Burke's Utilization of William James. Philosophy and Rhetoric 41 (2):pp. 130-152.
Patricia Pisters (2012). The Neuro-Image: A Deleuzian Film-Philosophy of Digital Screen Culture. Stanford University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #99,349 of 1,911,316 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #178,270 of 1,911,316 )
How can I increase my downloads?