Representation of similarities and correspondence structure
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):475-475 (1998)
| Abstract | Apart from the computationally appealing properties of representation by similarities, it is possible to extend this form of representation when needed to include object parts as well as the correspondence between subobject parts. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | No categories specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,701 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesBradley V. Stuart (1998). Visual Tasks Require Manipulable Representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):480-480.
Reza Zamani (2010). An Object-Oriented View on Problem Representation as a Search-Efficiency Facet: Minds Vs. Machines. Minds and Machines 20 (1):103-117.
Timothy L. Hubbard (2007). What is Mental Representation? And How Does It Relate to Consciousness? Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (1):37-61.
Ruth G. Millikan (1989). Biosemantics. Journal of Philosophy 86 (July):281-97.
Shimon Edelman (1998). Representation is Representation of Similarities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):449-467.
Martin Jüttner (1998). Representation of Similarities – a Psychometric but Not an Explanatory Concept for Categorization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):475-476.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads2 ( #232,575 of 549,125 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
