David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (2):185-209 (2010)
William James criticizes Hume for failing to adhere to the strictly empiricist method when he postulates discrete constituents of experience—which Hume calls perceptions—thereby making our experience a train of disconnected pieces. James argues that the discontinuity of experience in Hume results in part from his failure to recognize the immediate presence of relations in experience.1 Emphasizing a continuity and unity of experience, James thus differentiates his empiricism from Hume's as being radical in the sense that it recognizes relations as 'real' parts of experience just as are things that are experienced to be so related.2 This raises a question concerning the experiential status of relations in Hume: is ..
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Christopher Williams (2011). Aesthetics and Morals in the Philosophy of David Hume. Hume Studies 36 (1):109-113.
James Baillie (2000). Hume on Morality. Routledge.
Ruth Weintraub (2008). A Problem for Hume's Theory of Induction. Hume Studies 34 (2):169-187.
Steven Gamboa (2007). Hume on Resemblance, Relevance, and Representation. Hume Studies 33 (1):21-40.
Robert J. Roth (1998). Radical Pragmatism: An Alternative. Fordham University Press.
Annette Baier (2011). The Pursuits of Philosophy: An Introduction to the Life and Thought of David Hume. Harvard University Press.
Saul Traiger (2010). Experience and Testimony in Hume's Philosophy. Episteme 7 (1):42-57.
Eric Schliesser (2011). Philosophical Relations, Natural Relations, and Philosophic Decisionism in Belief in the External World: Comments on P. J. E. Kail, Projection and Realism in Hume's Philosophy. [REVIEW] Hume Studies 36 (1):67-76.
Tony Pitson (2006). George Campbell's Critique of Hume on Testimony. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 4 (1):1-15.
Added to index2010-08-04
Total downloads38 ( #43,235 of 1,096,734 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #164,128 of 1,096,734 )
How can I increase my downloads?